From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14126 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2009 01:00:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 14114 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2009 01:00:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from imr1.ericy.com (HELO imr1.ericy.com) (198.24.6.9) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:00:25 +0000 Received: from eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw750.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.77.50]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nAC10NQ8026040; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:00:23 -0600 Received: from eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se ([138.85.77.53]) by eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:00:14 -0600 Received: from eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.178]) by eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:00:14 -0600 Received: from EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.4]) by eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.178]) with mapi; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:00:13 -0500 From: Marc Khouzam To: Michael Snyder , "gdb@sourceware.org" Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:18:00 -0000 Subject: RE: real world reverse debugging success story Message-ID: References: <4AFB54CA.9090900@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <4AFB54CA.9090900@vmware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 [...] >=20 > Stats: used an 8 million instruction cache, running as a > ring buffer. Had to record over 80 million instructions > before I tripped the bug. Saved core file with record log > was 250 megabytes, and reloaded fine. Very impressive! How was the responsiveness? I assume you didn't step over all those instuctions ;-) So, you must have run the program and have it be recorded for a while. I'm wondering if the execution was annoyingly slow, or if it was ok. Thanks =20