From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17573 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2003 08:36:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17566 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 08:36:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gatek.vs.dasa.de) (53.122.197.194) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 3 Feb 2003 08:36:18 -0000 Received: from mailrelay1.vs.dasa.de by gatek.vs.dasa.de via smtpd (for sources.redhat.com [66.187.233.205]) with SMTP; 3 Feb 2003 08:37:12 UT Received: from ulm001.sysde.corp (ulm001.sysde.corp [149.207.22.81]) by mailrelay1.de.sysde.corp (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h138Ymx17936; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:34:48 +0100 (MET) Received: by ulm001.sysde.corp with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id <1FY9G85H>; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:34:49 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Kellogg, Oliver" To: "'Andrew Cagney'" , Joel Brobecker , "'aidan@velvet.net'" Cc: Paul Hilfinger , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Status of Ada support in GDB Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 08:36:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 Many thanks for your replies. Andrew Cagney wrote: > > There is still a bit missing. Aidan Skinner has been chipping away at > the problem of getting GNAT's code up to current standards. I find this surprising and beg detail. What is the issue about GNAT's code? -- Oliver