From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24187 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2003 16:09:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24180 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2003 16:09:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailgw3a.lmco.com) (192.35.35.7) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2003 16:09:52 -0000 Received: from emss04g01.ems.lmco.com ([166.17.13.122]) by mailgw3a.lmco.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAPG9DD15517; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:09:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.lmco.com by lmco.com (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30760) id <0HOX004010TDQ3@lmco.com>; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:08:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from EMSS04I00.us.lmco.com ([166.17.13.135]) by lmco.com (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30760) with ESMTP id <0HOX001890TDB0@lmco.com>; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:08:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from EMSS04M11.us.lmco.com ([144.219.10.27]) by EMSS04I00.us.lmco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:08:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:09:00 -0000 From: "Newman, Mark (N-Superior Technical Resource Inc)" Subject: RE: regarding transparent data ranges (in tracepoint support) To: ankit thukral , Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Jim Blandy , gdb@sources.redhat.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Nov 2003 16:08:00.0899 (UTC) FILETIME=[4C931D30:01C3B36E] X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00241.txt.bz2 Ankit How is it going? I am at a point now where I need to start looking at this if you aren't. Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: ankit thukral [mailto:ankit_plug@yahoo.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:01 AM > To: Newman, Mark (N-Superior Technical Resource Inc); Daniel > Jacobowitz > Cc: ankit thukral; Jim Blandy; gdb@sources.redhat.com > Subject: RE: regarding transparent data ranges (in tracepoint support) > > > > --- "Newman, Mark (N-Superior Technical Resource Inc)" > wrote: > > Sorry about the tunnel vision. When the SUT exits > > we loose all of the > > tracepoint data in target memory. Stopping that from > > happening is the > > next thing on my list after I finish making > > interrupt work. After the > > program finishes it should not exit without an ok > > from the engineer. > > > > So Ankit if that is what you are looking to do I > > agree completely. > > However can't gdbserver do something more like the > > restart that occurs > > with a "w" or "x" status after the putpkt in the > > case statement in > > server.c > > > > Mark > > > > > thanks for the solution Mark.restarting the > debuggee would surely work,just that some overhead may > be involved.but it sort of gives me a feeling of > hacking around the solution since the debuggee would > be run twice,2'nd time just for the transparent data > ranges. thanks for the solution anyway. > any comments on PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT ?? > > Ankit. > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > http://companion.yahoo.com/ >