From: Jim Ingham <jingham@apple.com>
To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: event-loop.c changes
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 17:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F51AEE62-D667-11D6-BB61-00039379E320@apple.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15771.31859.903292.158527@localhost.redhat.com>
Elena,
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 04:08 PM, Elena Zannoni wrote:
>
> Jim, I am looking at some of the changes in event-loop.c (from Keith's
> branch).
>
> I am not sure about a couple of things:
>
> This comment:
>
> void
> gdb_setup_readline (void)
> {
> /* This function is a noop for the async case. The assumption is
> that
> the async setup is ALL done in gdb_init, and we would only mess
> it up
> here. The async stuff should really go away over time. */
>
> if (event_loop_p)
> {
> [...]
> }
> }
>
> You meant 'sync' instead of 'async'?
Yup...
>
>
> The creation of these:
> gdb_stdout = stdio_fileopen (stdout);
> gdb_stderr = stdio_fileopen (stderr);
> gdb_stdlog = gdb_stderr; /* for moment */
> gdb_stdtarg = gdb_stderr; /* for moment */
>
> Is done in main.c, then again here, in gdb-setup-readline().
> But a comment in gdb_disable_readline suggests that they really
> shouldn't be created here at all.
> /* FIXME - It is too heavyweight to delete and remake these
> every time you run an interpreter that needs readline.
> It is probably better to have the interpreters cache these,
> which in turn means that this needs to be moved into
> interpreter
> specific code. */
Theoretically, I think this is true. But when we did some profiling of
gdb under PB, this really didn't show up at all, and changing this
didn't seem worth the effort. This only happens when you switch
interpreters, and that is a pretty heavy-weight operation anyway, so
this is in the noise.
At the same time I was trying to get the interpreter stuff working, I
was also fixing a bunch of bugs in getting a real asynchronous target
to work (not just event_loop_p = 1, but with real async execution).
One of the big problems was that if anything went the teeniest bit
wrong, then the wrong stdio handler would be left in place and though
in fact gdb was just stopped waiting for input, it thought it was still
talking to the inferior, so it was effectively hung... So I was very
suspicious about anything that mucked with the input & outputs to gdb
at the time, which was probably why I was so harsh on this...
But I got all the async stuff working without having to fix this, so...
Jim
--
Jim Ingham jingham@apple.com
Developer Tools
Apple Computer
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-03 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-02 16:11 Elena Zannoni
2002-10-02 17:36 ` Jim Ingham [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F51AEE62-D667-11D6-BB61-00039379E320@apple.com \
--to=jingham@apple.com \
--cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox