From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20454 invoked by alias); 7 May 2002 18:58:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20444 invoked from network); 7 May 2002 18:58:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (209.185.241.109) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 May 2002 18:58:04 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 7 May 2002 11:58:04 -0700 Received: from 200.11.240.6 by lw3fd.law3.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 07 May 2002 18:58:03 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.11.240.6] From: "Charles James Leonardo Quarra Cappiello" To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Bcc: Subject: questions / suggestions about gdb Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 11:58:00 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 May 2002 18:58:04.0044 (UTC) FILETIME=[1DE73CC0:01C1F5F9] X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2 Hi, I'm an often user of gdb, and i was wondering, since debuggers cant go to past states (no inversibility of the run), it would be nice if two instances of the debugger could run synchronized with a given step offset, so when the advanced instance break, the retarded instance stops, keeping an analogous state which can be studied. This actually can be done or is not feasible? If can't be done just now but is from the debugger's developers point of view feasible, consider this a feature request. -Charles Quarra _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com