From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1007 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2004 02:18:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 780 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2004 02:18:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO xinhuanet.com) (202.84.17.231) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2004 02:18:29 -0000 Received: from sd-robert([61.177.44.64]) by xinhuanet.com(AIMC 2.9.5.6) with SMTP id jm040359ce5; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:21:43 +0800 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:18:00 -0000 From: "Yorkwar" To: "rearnsha" Cc: "gdb" Subject: Re: Add systemc simulator with gdb Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AIMC-AUTH: yorkwar X-AIMC-MAILFROM: yorkwar@xinhuanet.com Message-ID: X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2 >R. > >[*] For the uninitiated, SystemC started life as a simulation class >library for C++ which enables you to use C++ in much the same way as you >would any other HDL (Hardware description language). However, by >restricting your description a suitable subset of C++ you can then >accelerate it significantly with special simulators and even run hardware >synthesis tools on it. The real power comes from the fact that your test >benches can be written in abstract C++ and can then interact with your >hardware description directly. It will be a great improvement to integrate a SystemC or HDL simulator in GDB. However, is there any reference about how to implement the library or bridge to compoment written in SystemC or HDL? Best regards.