Re: [rfc / remote protocol] Remote shared library events

Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-18T16:10:10Z

On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:04:49AM -0700, Jim Blandy wrote:
> Sorry --- of course the @var{r} associated with the dllstop isn't
> meaningless. Regarding the other pairs, I didn't realize that one
> wanted expedited registers for DLL events; would we actually use them?

Sure. For instance, if stop-on-solib-events was set, we would stop;
or if we were single-stepping multiple instructions we'd (I hope, I
haven't tested this) keep stepping.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery