From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23475 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2007 21:46:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 23467 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jan 2007 21:46:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from tmpnat1.honeywell.com (HELO AZ18CN851.global.ds.honeywell.com) (199.64.0.252) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:46:20 +0000 Received: from AZ18EV808.global.ds.honeywell.com ([131.127.167.102]) by AZ18CN851.global.ds.honeywell.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:46:17 -0700 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: GDB solib interface Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20070104213959.GA30083@nevyn.them.org> From: "Smith, Stephen \(SWCOE\)" To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" Cc: "General GDB Mailing List" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 So you are saying that after a continue, single step, etc. If my libraries have changed, I send a T packet and then what I normally would have sent? sps -----Original Message----- From: gdb-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Jacobowitz Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 2:40 PM To: Smith, Stephen (SWCOE) Cc: General GDB Mailing List Subject: Re: GDB solib interface On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 02:32:37PM -0700, Smith, Stephen (SWCOE) wrote: > Ok - I am not getting any T stop packets on the gdbserver end. Is there > something I have to do to get gdb to issue them? 'T' is something that gdbserver should send to GDB, not the other way around. --=20 Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery