From: "Smith, Stephen \(SWCOE\)" <Stephen.Smith@honeywell.com>
To: "Jim Blandy" <jimb@codesourcery.com>,
"dodji Seketeli" <dodji@seketeli.org>
Cc: <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: gdb very slow during 'step into'
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EF244E26469B2C42B2B72AC465843D6B03DFEF52@AZ18EV808.global.ds.honeywell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3vejnzy4m.fsf@codesourcery.com>
Sounds good, but I am experiencing the same problem. The trouble is
that on my platform, neither symbol is defined (I am running on an
embedded platform that does not have glibc ported to it.) What should
be the generic fix?
-----Original Message-----
From: gdb-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-owner@sourceware.org] On
Behalf Of Jim Blandy
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 12:52 PM
To: dodji Seketeli
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: gdb very slow during 'step into'
"dodji Seketeli" <dodji@seketeli.org> writes:
>> If you set the environment variable LD_BIND_NOW to a non-empty value
>> before running your program (use GDB's 'set env' command), does that
>> eliminate the slow steps?
>
> Wow, yes. It does eliminate the problem. Thank you !.
I'm glad that helped! But setting LD_BIND_NOW is just a workaround;
GDB ought to work properly without that. Could you apply the
following patch to GDB and see if it makes the problem go away, even
with LD_BIND_NOW left unset?
(Tested without regressions on Fedora Core 6 IA-32. I haven't been
able to reproduce the problem myself, so I'm just guessing that this
is the patch.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-03 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-02 15:24 dodji Seketeli
2007-01-02 19:29 ` Jim Blandy
2007-01-02 19:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-02 19:48 ` Jim Blandy
2007-01-02 21:39 ` Mark Kettenis
2007-01-02 22:59 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-01-02 23:45 ` Jim Blandy
2007-01-02 23:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-03 15:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-01-03 9:14 ` dodji Seketeli
2007-01-03 19:52 ` Jim Blandy
2007-01-03 19:59 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE) [this message]
2007-01-03 21:19 ` Jim Blandy
2007-01-03 20:59 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-01-03 21:17 ` Jim Blandy
2007-01-03 21:58 ` dodji Seketeli
2007-01-03 23:37 ` Jim Blandy
2007-01-03 23:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-04 0:00 ` Jim Blandy
2007-01-04 10:04 ` dodji Seketeli
2007-01-04 3:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-04 10:10 ` dodji Seketeli
2007-01-04 13:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=EF244E26469B2C42B2B72AC465843D6B03DFEF52@AZ18EV808.global.ds.honeywell.com \
--to=stephen.smith@honeywell.com \
--cc=dodji@seketeli.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=jimb@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox