From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19855 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2010 13:08:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 19809 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2010 13:08:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:08:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7479CB0259; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:08:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VLwBPIrI0Zwg; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:08:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D25CB0244; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:08:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: time to be serious about dropping CVS Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tristan Gingold In-Reply-To: <4B472BDC.1030301@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:08:00 -0000 Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sourceware.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20100101080137.GP2788@adacore.com> <4B472BDC.1030301@redhat.com> To: Phil Muldoon X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2 On Jan 8, 2010, at 1:58 PM, Phil Muldoon wrote: > On 01/01/2010 08:01 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Hello everyone, >>=20 >> Happy New Year! >>=20 >> Since I started using SVN, and even more so since I started using git, >> I have found that using CVS is very inconvenient, bordering on unbearabl= e. >=20 > Beyond the usual arguments and cons about CVS, the one thing that > really bites is that CVS always has to talk to a remote server. [...] Agreed. > My preference is for GIT, simply because of the speed. Sure. I now always work on gdb.git (from git mirror) but still use CVS to do my c= ommit. Using this approach makes the switch much less necessary (IMHO). Tristan.