From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14296 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2009 15:09:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 14285 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2009 15:09:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:09:37 +0000 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MB98o-000812-I0; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:09:34 -0400 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Mark Kettenis CC: teawater@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <200905311747.n4VHlY3b026655@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (message from Mark Kettenis on Sun, 31 May 2009 19:47:34 +0200 (CEST)) Subject: Re: System call support in process record and replay Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <83iqji529q.fsf@gnu.org> <200905311747.n4VHlY3b026655@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Message-Id: Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:09:00 -0000 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 19:47:34 +0200 (CEST) > From: Mark Kettenis > CC: teawater@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org > > I think it is up to whoever adds support for an OS that doesn't use > int 0x80 to come up with a more general solution. That's me ;-) I intend to add support for DJGPP. Thus my questions (and the numbers of interrupts hinted on that, btw). So please consider sharing your thoughts about this. TIA