Re: [rfc/remote] Tell remote stubs which signals are boring

Mark Kettenis
2006-10-26T17:54:06Z

> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:37:32 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:27:11PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Perhaps I should even add more confusing statements to that. What if I say
> > "handle SIGALRM nostop noprint pass" after I've connected to the remote
> > target. Will it send a new QPassSignals packet when I do that? AFAICT
> > from your patch it doesn't do that, and that seems broken to me.
>
> In fact it will do that. We check that the most recently sent
> QPassSignals packet matches the current set of ignored signals
> at every resume.

Cool!