Re: [rfc/remote] Tell remote stubs which signals are boring

Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-26T15:37:47Z

On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:27:11PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Perhaps I should even add more confusing statements to that. What if I say
> "handle SIGALRM nostop noprint pass" after I've connected to the remote
> target. Will it send a new QPassSignals packet when I do that? AFAICT
> from your patch it doesn't do that, and that seems broken to me.

In fact it will do that. We check that the most recently sent
QPassSignals packet matches the current set of ignored signals
at every resume.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery