From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18021 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2006 07:02:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 18012 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2006 07:02:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:02:54 +0000 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GczGN-0006oc-Q7; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 03:02:51 -0400 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: ddaney@avtrex.com, gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20061026014027.GA9023@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:40:27 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfc/remote] Tell remote stubs which signals are boring Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20061025212441.GA622@nevyn.them.org> <453FEB98.8090202@avtrex.com> <20061026014027.GA9023@nevyn.them.org> Message-Id: Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:02:00 -0000 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00253.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:40:27 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org > > > > Does this mean that you have to issue a 'set remote pass-signals' > > command, or is it done automatically for 'handle noprint nostop pass' if > > the remote stub supports it? > > > > Not being that familiar with the remote protocol, it is unclear to me. > > It will just work. Then this should be mentioned in the manual, both where the new packet and command are described, and where the "handle" command is described.