From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6839 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2001 17:21:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6362 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2001 17:20:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.pathwayconnect.com) (209.91.95.13) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Dec 2001 17:20:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 32207 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2001 17:20:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dazed) (192.168.0.149) by 0 with SMTP; 19 Dec 2001 17:20:15 -0000 Received: from dazed ([127.0.0.1] helo=there ident=sjackman) by dazed with smtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 16GkNa-0007Kb-00 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:19:42 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Shaun Jackman Organization: Pathway Connectivity To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Can't connect to remote target in a confused state Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 09:21:00 -0000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00169.txt.bz2 I forgot to mention I'm using gdb 5.1 on an i686 host. Cheers, Shaun On December 19, 2001 09:58, Shaun Jackman wrote: > Occasionally my target (arm-elf) may lose its brain due to a program error, > or what have you. Regardless, I'd still like to be able to attach to it > with gdb. I use a JTAG device (BDI2000) and as long as the ARM core isn't > frozen I should be able to attach. This is the error I'm getting... > > (gdb) target remote bdi:2001 > Couldn't establish connection to remote target > Cannot access memory at address 0xeafffff4 > > Now, I assume when I attach gdb is trying to figure out what frame/stack > etc it's in. So one of the frame pointer, or stack pointer, or program > counter is sitting at 0xeafffff4 and gdb is trying to read the memory > there. When it can't, it fails. Unfortunately, when this happens I have to > power-cycle my target and restart gdb to be able to get back to debugging. > > Is my analysis correct? Is there some way I can get gdb to attach to the > target even if it has been left in a "confused" state? My next actions are > likely going to be to "load" and "run" anyways, so I really don't care that > it's confused at the moment. > > Thanks, > Shaun