From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-6776-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20926 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2001 22:06:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20874 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2001 22:06:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO urtur) (203.100.224.149)
  by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 12 Nov 2001 22:06:44 -0000
Received: from rdb by urtur with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 163PKo-0000J4-00; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:13:42 +1100
Subject: Re: Vendor compiler problems and Results for 5.0.93 -nx gdb testsuite
 on
To: ac131313@cygnus.com
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 13:27:00 -0000
CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Reply-To: RDBrown@mira.net,RBrown64@csc.com.au
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E163PKo-0000J4-00@urtur>
From: RDBrown@mira.net
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2

>Hmm, devo no longer has gdb/gnu-regex.c so if this problem is there it 
>will be in a different form.  Have you tried just including libiberty?

Not yet. Will have a look.. Main point is that gdb 5.1 may require gcc
on platforms that don't provide alloca.

>Does it build using GCC?
gcc 2.95.3 built testresults were fine.

alpha-dec-osf4.0e built with gcc 2.95.x gives a gdb internal error on
startup but may work thereafter.