RE: Problem calling functions within gdb (version 7.5)

[Saurabh T <saurabh@hotmail.com>]

> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:12:03 -0700
> From: keiths@redhat.com
> To: saurabh@hotmail.com
> CC: gdb@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: Problem calling functions within gdb (version 7.5)
>
[... snip ...]
>
> The easiest way to get the patch is to use the git mirror and use commit
> e8370ca5. Or I can send it to you privately.
>
> Keith

Thanks, but I rolled back to 7.2 for the first case, and will wait on both the bugs being addressed in an official release. 		 	   		  
From gdb-return-42058-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org Fri Apr 26 02:21:17 2013
Return-Path: <gdb-return-42058-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gdb@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 19998 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2013 02:21:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gdb@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 19987 invoked by uid 89); 26 Apr 2013 02:21:16 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mail-vb0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-vb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 02:21:13 +0000
Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id x13so3157226vbb.6        for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s 120113;        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id         :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;        bh=BTuRzwnwZCxILAX61ANZYLIhq/x8E7KcD7QCYvPrhRw=;        b=ZKTpvVNjbtILWq1p57v8/5gecehg6jMtbFQseah9G0SCoEcmHxAj57sQB7wxHuNw+X         afhPpFo29e+Ll9PKNx7LYoTx2kT5w7htP80o0DuvGWlu0yVNyyy13FhVu4gAYDAlymfO         U4yjoN8IGqOmhMUIEgHXP+tlaJanIysJ+BgshRDT8M4AbGWKvInsTRxIZrjNCLqdx4l6         sIDbY6vWUdP91+nto73wYfT9EckiBsk8+Wwe78HnASGbWU/xran12b63qVvPJDQwJ+Eh         eF1gkxO/HTQ9HEd4rFYSL/3PQFZWa8m+Yn4+anDVBzq0xjLBYEoZQE8d4N8t7hpEIY4e         6vbQ=MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.132.232 with SMTP id ox8mr28232434veb.45.1366942871242; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.173.7 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130425074044.GE3458@adacore.com>
References: <CANFwon0v3pwvC_iJbEnzVp4ZB-B+zphAg-C+hrQqF153P+M_ag@mail.gmail.com>	<20130425064807.GA3458@adacore.com>	<CANFwon0DRN8pT4bpW-Fz=mqsdNqGkjY-bQkeTQ2PprzMQp8CKQ@mail.gmail.com>	<20130425072454.GC3458@adacore.com>	<CANFwon0TkHgc6rNipUWHN5zAwuGPb=oBwQdoJD2nhoWm+Tn=wQ@mail.gmail.com>	<20130425074044.GE3458@adacore.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 02:21:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADPb22Sq=RoM26gPh5g-C-DX+Z8svFOxRt-aJUTcPOq9JPc-AA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New format of 7.6 branch gdb/ChangeLog?
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>, gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlKMCRYc4OFAk8JzClZgvR3eU/Od1HelfnJSCvUnRHBv1sfB8hawnSqM4bz1Bfj9xv+qLFFrXztrRFHuhSUo2fFkAooFoyI094meMGDsj3NNy/q3gnf/wQCGGY5ypad4M1BeQeAf7sl6V5Sp1Q66m3Wap3UsbVP3qEuA9dmHwTGMQ7CDu/AvrWt/jo1n3B0WNfIPav4
X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2
Content-length: 565

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
> You put the "gdb/" back again. The correct answer is:
>
> 2013-04-24  Hui Zhu  <hui@codesourcery.com>
>
>         PR gdb/15165
>         * breakpoint.c (dprintf_print_recreate): New.
>         (save_breakpoints): Let it not save dprintf commands.
>         (initialize_breakpoint_ops): Set dprintf_print_recreate.

Not to nitpick much :-), but
note the *absence* of a blank line after "PR gdb/15165".

I'm seeing blank lines in other changelog entries,
and they shouldn't be there.