From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23984 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2009 18:34:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 23972 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Sep 2009 18:34:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.zeugmasystems.com (HELO zeugmasystems.com) (70.79.96.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:34:12 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [gdb-7.0 release] 2009-09-02 status and proposed plan Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20090902164425.GR4379@adacore.com> References: <20090902164425.GR4379@adacore.com> From: "Anirban Sinha" To: "Joel Brobecker" , Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 > >I think everyone is anxious to see the next release out as fast as >we can; it is going to be a major step forward compared to the previous >releases! You bet! We are among those who are waiting for the next release... patiently :) > >If there are any fixes that would be nice for the release but don't make >it to the 23rd, we can always have a corrective 7.0.1 release mid >December. Also, it sounds like a lot more new features are currently >being developed, and people are trying to make it for 7.0. I propose to >release 7.1 not too long after 7.0: Instead of waiting 6 months, we >could >release around end of January, early Feb (say: branch mid Jan, release >end of Jan). > >Thoughts? Sounds very reasonable. Great work guys! Cheers, Ani