From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31530 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2010 22:56:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 31522 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Dec 2010 22:56:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_SV,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp1.ugent.be (HELO smtp1.UGent.be) (157.193.71.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:56:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (mcheck3.ugent.be [157.193.71.89]) by smtp1.UGent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB33C3F69CE for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:56:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.UGent.be ([157.193.71.182]) by localhost (mcheck3.ugent.be [157.193.43.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bAacE7du8zIT for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:56:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [91.182.90.11]) (Authenticated sender: jmaebe) by smtp1.UGent.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 642DE3F69CF for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:56:05 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Symbolic constants inside classes From: Jonas Maebe In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:56:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1DD38938-E7BD-491F-905C-FCA963E5E941@elis.ugent.be> To: gdb@sourceware.org X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4D0FDF05.000/91.182.90.11/[91.182.90.11]/[192.168.1.2]/ X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 4D0FDF05.000 on smtp1.UGent.be : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000 X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 On 20 Dec 2010, at 22:23, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Jonas" =3D=3D Jonas Maebe writes: >=20 > What version of g++? Red Hat 4.1.2-48 (RHEL 5.5). > I tried this example with svn trunk gcc and CVS head gdb, and it worked. > I didn't try to find out whether the fix was in gcc or gdb. A colleague of mine found the following, so it seems like it may have been = fixed in gdb: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gdb.patches/59139 Jonas