From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16621 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2014 19:33:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16606 invoked by uid 89); 29 Apr 2014 19:33:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,URIBL_SBL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:33:09 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1WfDm5-0004Fa-V5 from donb@codesourcery.com ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:33:05 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-06.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.120]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:33:05 -0700 Received: from NA-MBX-02.mgc.mentorg.com ([169.254.2.230]) by SVR-ORW-FEM-06.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.120]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:33:05 -0700 From: "Breazeal, Don" To: Pedro Alves , Tom Tromey CC: "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: RE: Patchwork patch tracking system Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 22:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <20140402100842.GA956@blade.nx> <533F3713.40700@earthlink.net> <20140417135040.GA891@blade.nx> <20140422130652.GG5790@adacore.com> <8738gw6p4b.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <535FF637.1080405@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <535FF637.1080405@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 > -----Original Message----- > From: gdb-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-owner@sourceware.org] On > Behalf Of Pedro Alves > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 11:58 AM > To: Tom Tromey > Cc: Joel Brobecker; Gary Benson; Stan Shebs; gdb@sourceware.org > Subject: Re: Patchwork patch tracking system >=20 > On 04/29/2014 06:07 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >=20 > > I've been trying the patchworks install as well. I don't find it all > > that useful myself, but maybe it would be better if more people were > > using it. >=20 > I've been trying it out too. I've already found it useful to keep track > of which of my own patches I have pending. >=20 > I've been absent a little while from review, but I'm heading back, and > I'm using patchwork to guide me. >=20 > I like that it doesn't make the mailing list a second class citizen. > I'd be willing to continue giving it a try, but indeed I think it'd be > better if more people were using it. That'll be true for any tool we > end up with. >=20 > In the past week, I've been cleaning it up whenever I see that patches > have been pushed, even those that I didn't approve myself, but of course > it'd be better if who approves the patch or the submitter themselves > take care of their own patches. >=20 > non-maintainers shouldn't hold back from creating an account and > updating the state of their own patches. Whatever helps bringing the > load down from maintainers should help your own patches. :-) >=20 > Here's the current list of who-has-how-many-pending: >=20 > $ ~/bin/pwclient-hacked list -s New | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr > 35 Andy Wingo > 24 Andreas Arnez > 20 Yao Qi > 17 Jan Kratochvil > 16 Pedro Alves > 14 Siva Chandra > 13 Keith Seitz > 13 David Blaikie > 12 Andrew Burgess > 9 Doug Evans > 4 Kyle McMartin > 4 Hui Zhu > 3 Simon Marchi > 3 Eli Zaretskii > 3 Alan Modra > 2 Ulrich Weigand > 2 Mike Frysinger > 2 Doug Evans > 2 Alexander Smundak > 2 Agovic, Sanimir > 1 Vladimir Nikulichev > 1 Tom Tromey > 1 Sandra Loosemore > 1 Pierre Langlois > 1 Nick Clifton > 1 Mateusz Tabaka <8tab@wp.pl> > 1 Mark Wielaard > 1 Marcus Shawcroft > 1 Marc Khouzam > 1 Maciej W. Rozycki > 1 Julian Brown > 1 John Marino > 1 Gary Benson > 1 David Taylor > 1 Daniel Gutson >=20 > As you see, most of the patches so far, since we began tracking a few > weeks back, came from a small set of people. And I suspect many of > those are actually already in. A patch series that I posted to gdb-patches at the beginning of April doesn= 't seem to show up in patchwork. It would be good to understand why that i= s and how to fix it. https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00037.html https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00040.html https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00072.html https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00071.html thanks --Don