From: "Paul Koning" <Paul_Koning@Dell.com>
To: "Jie Zhang" <jie.zhang@analog.com>,
"Michael Snyder" <msnyder@vmware.com>,
"Dave Korn" <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>,
<gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: Reset breakpoint after load?
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D8CEBB6AE9D43848BD2220619A43F32649F076@M31.equallogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B58D811.8070604@analog.com>
> On 01/22/2010 05:19 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:29:06AM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> >>> On 19/01/2010 07:36, Jie Zhang wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> gdb-comm.exp sets breakpoints on exit and abort before load. The
> problem
> >>>> is that GDB tries to skip prologue according to what it reads
from
> >>>> memory, which might contain random data since the executable has
> not
> >>>> been loaded into memory. In my case, sometimes skip_prologue
might
> skip
> >>>> one or two more instructions, which happens to be an exception
> >>>> instruction and will trap the processor into an exception event
> loop
> >>>> after running the executable before hit the breakpoints.
> >
> > I've had this problem on a MIPS target, too.
> >
> I didn't notice this issue until recently a bug in toolchain linked in
> simulator libc for bare metal executable, which made this issue easily
> happen.
>
> >> I don't believe that gdb can tell when the (remote) inferior
> >> is started. All gdb knows is that target remote is started.
> >> Thus, if we connect to target remote and then load the image,
> >> there is an interval during which gdb will attempt to read
> >> the prologue bytes from un-initialized target memory.
> >>...
Yes, but... doesn't GDB take read-only data from the executable file
rather than from the target? If so then it should not matter. That's
what "set trust-readonly-sections" does. Or is it off by default? Turn
it on, that's good for performance anyway.
paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-22 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-19 7:36 Jie Zhang
2010-01-21 10:01 ` Dave Korn
2010-01-21 12:52 ` Jie Zhang
2010-01-21 18:29 ` Michael Snyder
2010-01-21 21:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-01-21 22:41 ` Jie Zhang
2010-01-22 2:15 ` Paul Koning [this message]
2010-01-22 3:05 ` Jie Zhang
2010-01-22 11:46 ` Paul Koning
2010-01-22 13:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-01-22 18:19 ` Michael Snyder
2010-01-21 22:35 ` Jie Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D8CEBB6AE9D43848BD2220619A43F32649F076@M31.equallogic.com \
--to=paul_koning@dell.com \
--cc=dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=jie.zhang@analog.com \
--cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox