Re: MI3 and async notifications

Jonah Graham
2019-07-05T21:58:53Z

On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 16:00, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 6/11/19 2:37 PM, Jonah Graham wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 04:50, Jan Vrany <jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz> wrote:
> >
> >> As you can see, you get the notification *before* ^done response. Does
> >> that answer
> >> your questions?
> >>
> >>
> > Yes that does. I think CDT will use the mi-always-notify option.
>
> Funny. ISTR that the breakpoint notification suppressing was
> originally done for CDT and reading/hearing Vladimir argue for
> it. :-D Though I can't find any arguing about that aspect
> around the original patch now:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-04/msg00471.html
>
> Vladimir said "As other MI notifications", but I checked out
> the tree for that commit (8d3788bd590a), and I couldn't find
> any other suppression that existed back then.
>

To be clear, "CDT will use the mi-always-notify" meant that CDT would make
use of the option to turn the always notify *off*. In other words, I wanted
GDB to provide it as an option and not have it always on.

Jonah