From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id ZsFRMoz3EmBFegAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:42:36 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id BDB281EF80; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:42:36 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (unknown [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6589F1E945 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:42:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC503384B825; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:42:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EC503384B825 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1611855756; bh=s2VLi+rzMsyyvCc7YV0JWvcu/wY8PFzcnas7UEJ1vZU=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=S3eZRxnH3XRFO74WPa5C3r1nWNBI+9r4CXFFIPJyijBoxPr4EBh+eRykAUK/1v1rS MqDwvfSvTmtzPL+D+HkmpFuUbzWYDeHZPbAkPOwOQhKi5c4IhrgnuUzXqs7TcL/9em 5qWPtnb+uCGwZ1sYTkPWhBZbl50tXCZMgSDKWLps= Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E6EF384B825 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:42:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 2E6EF384B825 Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id u20so6052692qku.7 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:42:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=s2VLi+rzMsyyvCc7YV0JWvcu/wY8PFzcnas7UEJ1vZU=; b=rmrz2xlC4CelMvfnCBbk0t37EAmk/HLrOVetGXI2xSe58hTIa4FXaEpExtOf4tYsds S8/u4XRScOD5JDRyHIfUabU+ANcT2f14sy2Ycw/SLWreYR9ugf1/AbH3PDMY6TLTX0Vv 6SVe8Mtrv9g9oN5C9O0kpWUqvVJTvZvHBfpyBDVvU2JP358O/EltNzoADSFSuNi6hIi8 wlMvmkTModKjTCOSDwatKEtC2X42ZoD6Z9fNXpGmjO850BygHdgbc3kylVfnUgL437i5 HQgJuekAxYweFGhuS9sWI8XdKY1fjasB4nZd1DcirfgIR6dF3V41o9Z8FZmxjicw0q+1 bAHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fsZN99xDiNHbObU5DO4RBa9L/FyHOcNoMJxA+CK0L3ACD1dHQ OydMiFzyoRyvrG9QhZoKxrPEdXP0/3cVp94p3pQkHw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyhk+hLVLfNSne90//iuGiSb6eZsrF/+S9GqGTDBlgEeGhR/5WpXLx3+XWyA2EX+VB+Sb3/XLQFCpO6OQIhiw= X-Received: by 2002:a37:9581:: with SMTP id x123mr254096qkd.439.1611855752584; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:42:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <83y2gdx9ae.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:41:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to display instructions around the current instuction? To: Peng Yu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Christian Biesinger via Gdb Reply-To: Christian Biesinger Cc: Reuben Thomas via Gdb Errors-To: gdb-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:37 PM Peng Yu via Gdb wrote: > > I have already thanked other people who send correct answers. But > helping by definition should making sure the answers are correctly. It > is not a valid excuse to say to post untested wrong results are OK > because of "helping". > > If an answers is not correct, it should not be sent in the first > place. In stackoverflow, wrong answers can be deleted. But mailing > lists don't have this options. Therefore, the senders should make sure > the correctness of the answers before sending them out. I hate to take this further offtopic but would like you to consider that if people were required to test all suggestions first, many responses would not be sent in the first place. For example, I did not test my hook-stop suggestion. I am not sure that people would be better off in such a world. Christian > > On 1/28/21, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:06:55 -0600 > >> From: Peng Yu via Gdb > >> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org > >> > >> Please test your recommendation before sending it out. It is not > >> appropriate to waste other people's time. > > > > Hey, no one here works for you, you know! So please appreciate that > > people are "wasting their time" on helping you achieve your goals, and > > be thankful. > > > > > -- > Regards, > Peng