From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-43821-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21093 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2014 16:45:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 21003 invoked by uid 89); 17 Oct 2014 16:45:23 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-yh0-f54.google.com
Received: from mail-yh0-f54.google.com (HELO mail-yh0-f54.google.com) (209.85.213.54) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:45:22 +0000
Received: by mail-yh0-f54.google.com with SMTP id z6so532085yhz.27        for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.29.172 with SMTP id i32mr3812171yha.179.1413564320158; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.170.140.214 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMQQO3kAPanS0uPPjUjiTFjpkOKUR5CiV55BJMbbA2p_J7d3nQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMQQO3knCrj=7dQNV1NEJofLhm7gZzvzG55K66uDOJt7qYrjGg@mail.gmail.com>	<543FBDFF.3050709@redhat.com>	<104DEFBD-D686-4290-8E3C-725A51C165E6@dell.com>	<CAMQQO3=GxjGzF-9RXQsJ_9=Du3rS-UoYFA_0-friPp1nMa8yAA@mail.gmail.com>	<7BB30632-15BE-4EF8-B84F-D35A27772F18@dell.com>	<CAMQQO3kAPanS0uPPjUjiTFjpkOKUR5CiV55BJMbbA2p_J7d3nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:45:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAP9bCMQf5K6_LfkGTBRcdxuJsZOwiJvgevLUm+kKtouY=OZT4g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: recursion limit exceeded in Python API, but there's only one function in traceback
From: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=96mer_Sinan_A=C4=9Facan?= <omeragacan@gmail.com>
Cc: paul_koning <Paul_Koning@dell.com>, pmuldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>, gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:18 AM, =C3=96mer Sinan A=C4=9Facan <omeragacan@gm=
ail.com> wrote:
> 2014-10-16 18:03 GMT+03:00  <Paul_Koning@dell.com>:
>> Is that the handler for a breakpoint?  Does the completion of the =E2=80=
=9Csi=E2=80=9D command invoke the breakpoint handler?  If yes, that=E2=80=
=99s your answer.
>
> I see what you mean now. I think you're right...

Yikes.  If there is another breakpoint at the next instruction then
ok, otherwise that feels unfortunate.
[implementation detail bubbling up into the API, bleah]