From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>,
sanimir.agovic@intel.com, Stan Shebs <stan_shebs@mentor.com>
Subject: Re: [Discussion] add a build option for test to gdbserver
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 07:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANFwon1yQfDKGhCq2fd6X2Z3tMLQycBJt5dAHqbymu1G2iTU0g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22SYWBRd==14+q-DZgU2qSaTjXRo_fxLS2e_K=8FH4GD3g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> There are more and more function add to the target remote to support
>> different gdbstub.
>> Some of them can add a this function to gdbserver. Then the testsuite
>> for it can just test with gdbserver. For example: tracepoint.
>>
>> But some function is hard to achieve or not very useful for gdbsever.
>> I just work on some patches just have this function for example: TD
>> breakpoint. TA.
>> So I suggest what about add a build option for test to gdbserver? this
>> option just for test.
>> It maybe just send some fake package back to GDB remote or something.
>> Then we can easier write test for this remote patches.
>
> Hi. I think you need to elaborate.
>
> Setting aside unittests that can test individual pieces of gdb/gdbserver,
> something has to talk to gdbserver in order to test it,
> and there is testsuite/gdb.server for gdbserver specific tests.
Hi Doug,
Thanks for your remind.
I think I should talk it clear in the title. I think it should be
"Add a build option that test remote target to gdbserver".
What about it?
And there is some thought of me:
To test remote target, we add them to gdbserver and use a build option
control. And when we build gdbserver, we can build 2 gdbserver.
One is just to use, and named it as "gdbserver".
Others is just for test, and named it as "gdbservertest".
Thanks,
Hui
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-28 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-19 16:41 Hui Zhu
2013-02-26 17:28 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-28 7:16 ` Hui Zhu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANFwon1yQfDKGhCq2fd6X2Z3tMLQycBJt5dAHqbymu1G2iTU0g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=teawater@gmail.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=sanimir.agovic@intel.com \
--cc=stan_shebs@mentor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox