Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yichao Yu <yyc1992@gmail.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: JIT debugging (Attach and speed)
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMvDr+TKDYeECiUK7Kz7TGSRF826Vq24z_=CPQXz1vyxmMUm_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

I've recently seen some issues when debugging julia JIT code with GDB.
Some of these might worth a bug report but I'd like to post here first
since the most blocking issue was discussed here a few years ago.

1. Registering JIT code to GDB is O(n^2) and this is very bad for
serious JIT users like julia. (I've seen 10k to 100k jit objects
generated in the test)

   The issue was discussed on this list ~2011[1] but it seems that the
issue is still there. I was also told that lldb 3.8 should support the
same JIT debugging interface without the O(n^2) slow down[2].

2. JIT code registration on attach is broken.

    When I set a breakpoint on `jit_inferior_init`[3] (i.e. lauching
gdb with `gdb --args gdb -p <pid_to_debug>`) which IIUC is what
responsible for walking the jit object list at init time, it seems
that the function is never called.

    (I haven't seen a bug report about this yet)

3. (minor) Reading debug info from JIT object file generates read of large size.

   This triggers an assertion in rr[4]. It's arguably rr's fault to
assume a upper limit on the read request size (fixed now) but since
this doesn't happen otherwise I'd just like to point this out in case
some optimization is needed here.

[1] https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-01/msg00002.html
[2] https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/14846#issuecomment-176902134
[3] https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=gdb/jit.c;h=afc1c517fa745582bd198601e46a77af72114017;hb=HEAD#l1323
[4] https://github.com/mozilla/rr/issues/1665#issuecomment-192983671


             reply	other threads:[~2016-03-22 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-22 14:56 Yichao Yu [this message]
2016-03-22 15:46 ` Pedro Alves
2016-03-22 16:10   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2016-03-22 16:15   ` Pedro Alves
2016-03-22 16:23     ` Yichao Yu
2016-03-22 16:41       ` Pedro Alves
2016-03-22 16:47         ` Yichao Yu
2016-03-22 17:00           ` Pedro Alves
2016-03-23  2:18             ` Yichao Yu
2016-03-23  4:51               ` Yichao Yu
2016-03-23 18:24                 ` Pedro Alves
2016-03-23 19:32                   ` Yichao Yu
2016-03-23 19:48                     ` Pedro Alves
2016-03-23 20:51                       ` Yichao Yu
2016-03-24  1:17                         ` Pedro Alves
2016-03-24  3:14                           ` Yichao Yu
2016-03-24 21:02                             ` Yichao Yu
2016-03-23 12:24               ` Pedro Alves
2016-03-23 13:31                 ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMvDr+TKDYeECiUK7Kz7TGSRF826Vq24z_=CPQXz1vyxmMUm_w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=yyc1992@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox