From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id jQzLK0UWaGJXtAIAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 11:56:53 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id ABDC51E058; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 11:56:53 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=lY+bndsw; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3187C1E00E for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 11:56:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB453858C54 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 15:56:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CEB453858C54 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1650988612; bh=+H4bhY1J76iR9I0KRxyei0iXdj/clR8G90N4U/g4ZYQ=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=lY+bndswD8sdz4iabFo1Ap/LlDXs7/2oLzfNXPDtP6BaAV8o5Xb+VYBhOF5USpqt4 h0N1hgluz7rAk+jb7UiI6QsIvC2zj1er0hqT7sn2a1OYhRlmNjdtYm2jogQ8vHzZM9 zADXqnn6+SI9cj/yLs07KOr72W/X4Gs4cJzEX3aw= Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CD763858C83; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 15:55:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6CD763858C83 Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id b15so18355936pfm.5; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:55:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+H4bhY1J76iR9I0KRxyei0iXdj/clR8G90N4U/g4ZYQ=; b=kH62dKxZw0SMm0gOk3P8VvHnFVVY3su2jJNSyb+VF4sCNijsauAUgyaVACTeMGi5ef +Dfv41oszk7t/WlxsnfROmYlDXGe8Ag10PnCFJsHNxOPZyV5xZ0D1IXi36pi4kCb3Xbh TrA6PMuCEy/LUWboTxWuA6ra/YA82icnXpjZ4yq325yFoukBzVKVhhzjHjSLPzMXZHTG Gjn2Ifm9gcfmaJRYTMDznagKuddD+Pg30E8i764lubX5sjUEGJU4+YXkP0lsDPEZCgww qG2EUZmlulfcPYa2j14WJSOGvN/OGsr7pGw+WaqZM/WhE1RIJBM9J5CevdEBeeyMBeYa SBRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533CW3YOz7uFAxKanU9oTvK5c0rdz+xrit+JzPHe71Yf8wTXV32A Q48v0LGZB6dO2BS4eCKVt1I4GeCs4/xjokL02Pw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyq1mYa0NnGpeCbEtD9/Y/IZ0eiprVzw29jfBQhddRCtiBvr4ISbbsFBw3jc9DatXbIbZKKXIlDnzTPvy2Na8M= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:c8d:b0:50a:51fe:e462 with SMTP id a13-20020a056a000c8d00b0050a51fee462mr24977164pfv.43.1650988525457; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:55:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5c1f217a-109c-2973-6c69-abf412133dee@arm.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:54:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Adding binutils to the GNU Toolchain buildbot on sourceware To: Alan Modra Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: "H.J. Lu via Gdb" Reply-To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Overseers mailing list , "gdb@sourceware.org" , Mark Wielaard , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Binutils Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 8:33 PM Alan Modra wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 08:20:50PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > I think we should try to keep builds/checks under 10 minutes, that the > > Related to that, there are some x86_64 gas and ld tests that I find to > be annoying resource hogs when running multiple binutils target builds > in parallel. gas/testsuite/gas/i386/rept and > ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr17618 both require over 1G of memory. > > HJ, would you please look at reducing the memory footprint of those > test? These tests check if large memory footprints are handed properly. What do you recommend? -- H.J.