From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-46649-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 63427 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2018 17:23:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 63414 invoked by uid 89); 11 Oct 2018 17:23:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*c:alternative
X-HELO: mail-vs1-f43.google.com
Received: from mail-vs1-f43.google.com (HELO mail-vs1-f43.google.com) (209.85.217.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 17:23:37 +0000
Received: by mail-vs1-f43.google.com with SMTP id e206so9321151vsd.0        for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to         :cc;        bh=NLN1HYKVJth4ORI/3DIzG/22aYLsfNMHV/rFvcwjlOc=;        b=u4otuNovVBth/+BFBF+QX5a8i/kEGqOWC+367Z0d/rB2xjXuaEcnrMy8Oy5Ak+imLk         lacxaMMy33veklO1U/jVHvmNbVBn1wRpOQVdxRLZsZGYoOqNgMc+jQ+8ShzvVWR8Eb+W         7ZaXOI9wmhNxlq3JHfQuy6rgn/aE8iJtatX9MMmu9NaGRoz9OKQSaBbQqJ6MxEPYU3w1         Po6eD3XlNpHqRWCN2eljfiR5Sw5U/aFaogWSOyEAtvMKVuRtMA0GeO10IXThtp/P7IE2         dXTw0cXuV52glGNDRt/lMs7lmk7ebzydHOpnNJAP5oDRLMiOZvr35jfSrl9UoV67nTCn         A+tA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM4wpo_0SNkU7FSo8_=YBShWfmqJMa73=+DL7P-yTKXzHpLO9Q@mail.gmail.com> <0eeb55ca-d4e1-4db4-e601-74ca7e1151e2@redhat.com> <CAM4wpo9EgNZeQsW1Bhv9F-AdO_=mwLNo-euAtKd7A6BeKdgHwA@mail.gmail.com> <11b018ef2ea200e314dbce95f424eb6c@polymtl.ca> <CAM4wpo9k2OCtHdwoO5EAaDk2uMqTrK48Nb+A33FP8Wds0vryqQ@mail.gmail.com> <a1a26ad1-b1ae-04c5-20ca-c891676f938c@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <a1a26ad1-b1ae-04c5-20ca-c891676f938c@redhat.com>
From: Bill Morgan <arthurwilliammorgan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 17:23:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAM4wpo94v9qPSzydOj5M9PX9o1oerTCCFEkWb+ZDBWv6v1gKEA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: gdb ignoring vCont supported commands
To: palves@redhat.com
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>, gdb@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2

On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 4:12 PM Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 10/09/2018 09:29 PM, Bill Morgan wrote:
> > So it is now recognizing the vContSupported, but it is still sending
> > vCont;s
> >
>
> Argh, I forgot that this only really works on ARM GNU/Linux.
> What is your target?
>
> We're missing the small infrastructure change in GDB
> mentioned in the discussion I linked before.
>

This looks like the same issue:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21272