From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 3mh6KiDF22jZrRkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 07:55:12 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=hp1PvgWF; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 927991E047; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 07:55:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F75E1E047 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 07:55:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8331B3857C67 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 11:55:11 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8331B3857C67 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1759233311; bh=QrTTmGhnXN8q4M3F/VCGNumf089vNDDR7/nVQUFAHQk=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=hp1PvgWFDufl9ME+CHDRZv6gODbV1qab5gVANJdUWZPEGQOJ8anbhn/u5YVCsKOWa siCuiaYTWkiXrOGoTfdmxC5i0HKaBRISOG7vnmgcIrsPU8dpP9+2Z8Qe2gLaDzRW+8 y5S6buaduRA8R6QdHjbDHnJcAHGSCUQlic5iDeLI= Received: from mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.168.131]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BD533858CDA for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 11:54:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 2BD533858CDA ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 2BD533858CDA ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759233260; cv=none; b=nFhxwdKwWRNBn8jz0IXYc/ea/GxUTTailJwc9c152ZSXsSfG2eOXzD/bbsjBPW73IYUWvkTOCao7juRs1MFiTxx540pCPzTUHjcfADNdnFRRj/DeyeU9w1E+5cUgkn7+nLKRz13RooEtdAzWfCTCis1FzTptAVQnUXxvopVb6G8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759233260; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SV5oV3HFJ8DbgJuU318Rs6Cy0rkMKbRrCsrdFrySUDU=; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=YEnPbriqSPkP6klMd1hKN6HPETN+zt1Edj5ZDa78nq35iEdfdClzFHDo9UxphPIaJU7uA6q700GGqpz5IPRlnL3JLbRnGsuyOykgg/DY7Z/qPez5+2+ZT5A1/YLHipJKgYvmIeFMVgsWauuX/OX7AfrfdZ00hOHj0qyORrE/1jM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2BD533858CDA Received: from pps.filterd (m0279862.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 58U4I569031650 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 11:54:19 GMT Received: from mail-pl1-f199.google.com (mail-pl1-f199.google.com [209.85.214.199]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 49e8pdgk43-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 11:54:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mail-pl1-f199.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-269af520712so63629855ad.2 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1759233258; x=1759838058; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QrTTmGhnXN8q4M3F/VCGNumf089vNDDR7/nVQUFAHQk=; b=fhbxU82PawO7goQ3jPbqKg8Of5TntYX7hNgJooCW9ZzwNo+gegrpZqpvR59DBuoZTt r6JQkUObIHwrF/aZ2wzcjFZ9zUbLO1hKL5PlIaCYWlGD4I2qSYCRuUZpkXQi867J0Xf5 BFRUgdq0a9WbnyJJfM7ZFoZocjTDk+yxDFUrNpwcAgiBOSAy5GaItPBaxDr18+R7IhFi YWoY5Wqq17IL0CvTBKP47umDcoQxzvjiUsL5EZYu6ENTx/WnWVRjzZTu6mN4O5r876bv Kf/r40CjGJNqBv330rMhgKMQuodqTDbLE6WfnjIlTTv+K7NqsTCEfwXUoApt9qQicDC+ hynA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV3L4ORaRk5ML5psamwUpwgMWNyesmba3Q4IiiQZmfUARtDHP9KwCFCY0Q1bWDFOEnfvTw=@sourceware.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzsvsrU+tReVfBtk+BxplmPwG7UTs2BR2ypbH/0+r2UibNjTNwf EP2977iTo+HxTV2N1j9pyBQRbKizIsJssv7d9PHNnix8+pm4JrKn+sjFXPEn71/jgbG2RfOIi2Y mJ+dckzWForwNV08MoHxrkJ7PuH6e23zaTVg8zSaXzPGQUHboiLuH0rKnWgjXqwqJQzvYrfBqLE O6zAhN6hMrLfGhtr9gE0xBI9RFAjDv X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvfZ9rCJ4xivBSy82TD9V8BsAy6k0WK6MBmqsUnU2MVi+37YNpyeIJyfWQH/eg 6JQfS2rhHgxEt8xf7uFXsm8l6L5fc9wKsyLvlovtqxtZQO5wkbUaxBqeEK3mv9+EzjmKd5sHvyJ oNF86nLXk7DDsmYTa0WWnsozFXWEg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1110:b0:288:e46d:b318 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-288e46db6famr81653305ad.40.1759233258235; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 04:54:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEt9gdFb6uQrszliq8XrsBuwl+s+ZHmb444JQNf8TuKKYgVs7wx9bCkDRFvr75vyPxio1DTMS+IiteGXal3DHc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1110:b0:288:e46d:b318 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-288e46db6famr81653025ad.40.1759233257822; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 04:54:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87wm5g2xcr.fsf@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 04:54:05 -0700 X-Gm-Features: AS18NWBZMshTJ96CpnfH-c_5n-fCOx4OD6Z95AWjPZ-ZGehEwZFSZ0wuuVvgbC8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bugzilla keyword for beginner issues to work on To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: Dhruv Chawla , Sam James , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, guinevere@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-GUID: ZzAVApaxv48fdNXI_6RqPRusMYGqkz03 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=MYZhep/f c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=68dbc4eb cx=c_pps a=JL+w9abYAAE89/QcEU+0QA==:117 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=yJojWOMRYYMA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=EUspDBNiAAAA:8 a=b-vctuxJu35pNsGFP3YA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=324X-CrmTo6CU4MGRt3R:22 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: ZzAVApaxv48fdNXI_6RqPRusMYGqkz03 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUwOTI3MDAzNiBTYWx0ZWRfXyFyR2xIRX3dZ uTJpJ1gghhNDNSKCtl93mV7blHte+RU2twpK1WLegA5wG8nLoq4L473XCICr8drnt7np6lUu2dB t4bpZ56wa/MSNxt26PZzrTdxE3iMkvzHN8FSzYrctllpprvUEtFDXeuBTOIefsn9EjVCppDk4ZT pFh7vwsTRCqnynfFYoobTUQaZejpWraHFKNv2H5hebBpTWYhmLcr1gax4GYi7fjnygpL2MFfaWD W8TvLf2oIss1qaYWnF6XjoUo6WMqyjajTnXLrBLjCVW7/JroDJ3W7OSZNhuGaZIg3Oxa+elnYlE y3+GZJbUw9tSne+m27Kc3eDd+lt0jXo7jq6Iid8knbSgCvBWq7uMOLIwoWU1VtveXDd03B0MKmD sgsFTm7nNea9XWUMcTp25Kq1GDje1Q== X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1117,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-09-30_02,2025-09-29_04,2025-03-28_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2509150000 definitions=main-2509270036 X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Andrew Pinski via Gdb Reply-To: Andrew Pinski Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 2:04=E2=80=AFAM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 09:39, Dhruv Chawla via Gcc wro= te: > > > > On 30/09/25 13:19, Sam James via Gcc wrote: > > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > > > > > > > Andrew Pinski writes: > > > > > >> Hi all, > > >> As talked about during the GNU tools cauldron, the gdb and gcc > > >> keywords usage here are different but folks mentioned it would be a > > >> good idea to have the same between the 2 bugzilla instances. Right n= ow > > >> gcc is easyhack while gdb uses good-first-bug. Both have issues with > > >> the naming of each. > > > > > > 'good-first-*' is what people tend to search for in other > > > projects. Having it aligned (and optimising for new contributors) mak= es > > > sense, I think. > > > > > >> [...] > > > > > > sam > > > > +1 to this. I feel like "beginner-improvement" and "easyhack" are harde= r to > > parse than "good-first-bug" or "good-first-issue" (which LLVM uses FWIW= ), and > > it is not immediately obvious to me what either of them mean. > > Yeah, I really don't care that somebody might decide to work on a > "good first issue" as their second or third issue. It would still a > good first one for somebody else, it just happens to be that person's > second or third. > > "beginner-improvement" is too long, and I had the same question as > Florian about who or what is being improved. Those are all good points about "beginner-improvement" that I didn't think = of. Note on the issue of bug vs issue; I rather go with issue rather than bug; as bug can be seen as more negative than an issue. Or maybe change. first-good-change but let's see what other projects use. Thanks, Andrew