Re: Meeting Minutes - Office Hours for CTI - 2026-09-18

[Andrea Pinski via Gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 12:14 PM DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 3:03 PM Andrea Pinski via Binutils
> <binutils@sourceware.org> wrote:
> > So there was no consensus on the community members except for the ones
> > who were at the meeting?
>
> You would prefer "so there was no consensus except for the ones who
> were on the mailing list" ?
>
> Carlos and Mark have both been diligent in announcing these meetings
> and posting minutes.  If you choose to ignore them, that's on you.

Hmm, no carlos has been diligent in announcing the meetings.  Also it
conflicts with many other meetings I have.  And it is NOT a time that
is viable for me.
So I have not chosen to ignore them.  And now you are dictating how
this consensus should be brought together in the same way you mention
Zack is doing.

>
> > Ok. I think that it is wrong to have separate domains.
>
> I think it's inevitable.
>
> > Also why NOT just one email list?  Why 6 mailing lists?
>
> Why not 47?  Why not zero?  If you have a specific request, please
> make it and justify it.  We have an *opportunity* to reorganize
> mailing lists if/when we move the mail servers, but we *can*
> reorganize the lists any time we want, too.

Right and that is my point this should be a separate unrelated
discussion rather there are many different discussions going on and
things are being tied to the move for no reason.

>
> > What is the need for glibc-stable?
>
> Downstream maintainers who need to watch for bugfixes.  I would hope
> by now everyone would know this.

Why not just use -announcement for that?

>