From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id aJaiNhO5NWRs/SgAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:46:27 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id DB7281E221; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:46:27 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=PqPxfJj4; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F0B11E110 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:46:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1873857437 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 19:46:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2E1873857437 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1681242386; bh=8h3LsMPc0KXLXVcSu0higd4jNyEgCK8qLrm/U4YjAJw=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=PqPxfJj4bheYcNTMzvZJJQuN1FKMJjVWlws+ej/kHIqjnDmBraL5z1RZdJqmZThMY BpiwHhfLvIUDC4F2dU5gd3zEhkt15AQBY69M+cWGJR/o/airQeqrRXFfeMdHUwBeX3 gd+Pb0gMZSscxJTWmwAXt0JPWIbugNwdZWdjgMEU= Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A61653858D28 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 19:45:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org A61653858D28 Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5027e589e20so4819431a12.3 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:45:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681242356; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8h3LsMPc0KXLXVcSu0higd4jNyEgCK8qLrm/U4YjAJw=; b=ttQF3mofv/jZy2zGmWYtQL7+SS+7+l8UOwvKK0GqYzo7tDGcnL4ylcVHohBnyzH8KV /15RN0IpCL45L0h9RtffMoFrcDLJ8YgzROh2Aoqa1UUlbVwVVc6BzdEVdnvvsPYQiuAv a5l45a1mDp1qwIfUxrh1bWnqJcvrVT3pUpPIpM2ej80xpbCL/CYhfTgWOy4SlxEizpcJ tpy/GLjYWGo7fT3guaR8ZT6sqO0wuI3LwVGovO+v8C+VtBnn0bt5vtcLb/W7+xbrmOJc 6BcdURoPcjM0pfMLu4dU5w+sS1/8copcykoSdPZe5vinosb0xq9PcPdynw/3u1wrR72G 71cQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fjCWU/EGZaOjuAjkOB/4bn3yyHhYuvz/5hhEN0X6La7wArxR2D /Riud1PEQ4bADmNrA0caUx52TaHuQ4Q7XLqxg1DqmA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350acsMrwgHlhlWruHg1qDBq+QV0c893i4SEPje5br14Y0vuOTCVPOhdb+jRQi6AtVZuy7srSZDhaepX7T0JCe1k= X-Received: by 2002:a50:c31b:0:b0:4fb:30fc:1e98 with SMTP id a27-20020a50c31b000000b004fb30fc1e98mr5536780edb.0.1681242356071; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:45:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1c38b926-e003-0e21-e7f1-3d5dbec2aabf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1c38b926-e003-0e21-e7f1-3d5dbec2aabf@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:45:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: Adding a SECURITY.md document to the Binutils To: Nick Clifton Cc: Binutils , siddhesh@gotplt.org, "gdb@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Ian Lance Taylor via Gdb Reply-To: Ian Lance Taylor Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 1:43=E2=80=AFAM Nick Clifton via Binutils wrote: > > Many open source projects have a SECURITY.md file which explains > their stance on security related bugs. So I thought that it would > be a good idea if we had one too. This is quite nice, thanks for doing this. Ian