From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id UCdyG1R5M2Yx9AIAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 02 May 2024 07:30:28 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=uywh61dw; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 6A61D1E0C1; Thu, 2 May 2024 07:30:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 599FD1E030 for ; Thu, 2 May 2024 07:30:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93553857C4F for ; Thu, 2 May 2024 11:30:25 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A93553857C4F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1714649425; bh=JFSpnv9NBGyaS/uGe+M94XlvuGqq9U/Gdyv5iUa0rtc=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=uywh61dw7pNeVuN6dR4HRAv6BFsixU0/XOheuEVKMXr+UVl/a/ZZjs01IIzNqP10M cQQEb0CJwglmTXEn8zE/Mm4Ckppos4kCF+Rf3oSE7oQeoNE+ZFk5KK64m2tp6FKhKK Uc5+X/PDs52K2nGwqUcks3K7+V+rFTpXr+PJd3uk= Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 711993858CDB for ; Thu, 2 May 2024 11:29:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 711993858CDB ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 711993858CDB ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1714649377; cv=none; b=urLFltIKz+IgPU+fHytlMIoJlXEiXcAN2bm0ueun/AdT1aBlXRIoKQFCzXqlbvfxIAo8w5kvoxVoBjrE5ZtBGemWuS8qIkiX3H+Ete/DUXM0R52RHQLYyS+JbJPLTtDSKPUT9bfrGJeOZiMc62/P6og2nnuNE5K/vh1wS00qHdQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1714649377; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ei3c4qWdVrgmouhyimw4M15pKNd+4LNLvB+uxy23B54=; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=iIzu81lTWh4bPaoDeS77CR8MI6rrQ1QVPATssXmP9+sv8asa8OBjYIFeIdFCP3btCSATouEgn2uoMChkno+JWktJRVHlfnDh5hre04ohY3aA38lW/LDZ2w/2GU+kHAipeLVFT0G3304yri/v5eLRTUopr1RduWNLl41NpWmvyu4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5ce6b5e3c4eso4568934a12.2 for ; Thu, 02 May 2024 04:29:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714649374; x=1715254174; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JFSpnv9NBGyaS/uGe+M94XlvuGqq9U/Gdyv5iUa0rtc=; b=mETqN27CttzS7JqmLI7oqBTJxu7g84MANmdEhmgFTSp2HS3XXf5yMv1C5bO5/Lm9fP b6OFXa552SvIM7ZsNZZt+sEmRIHKG9qOLZU9gibhUWwramFlXHJQLAUkLbWA3m1MyVLi zFFKIk8feFyJJTBywh7OWc2qPn9Qy4dvFM0IjIWTQNREIEsa26QV/s6cb1GuffW2hbXX fGencSvxLpDsMee4OxXkjkN7TOLbEwm679rBSBDcn+NXkn9KPZ3hVn0tu/i9qRZRNZ4p x5zTD+eOQG3U5nA551AxFzNEPc1efFJ6b3UGrAy+CKsXeViAr/r5vX76RovaLtZr5uZt DGVw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW381G/bJDB1e8iXY2Q9xzHa6aiYOOqtDaZv7jgcBOnpLvAyG9ss6DCXetDE5u1eOXu24bZwOyqqvg+SEWMKcQeC/4= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwoUzYvQ6dG2hmbXgi+ocs4YUQUnOjvO08QhXG/lhR+1+kshRV+ U825amCx1CPMaJDrZzKnHwtLP9J6qOFmJH435tGwENRvv7MhE0+Z9wTwyXgzlsHe8gyGFskjqKC WkWz1EyarFygNn/yjEYZk1dmKOZ1HNHXvrzmy X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFsAPAQvKChsCYnu1tQxQJEFTidqsOc25+iyxgeuMfcPQcBL+ZJtfud09xnnJHB8SsKuYv88iSd6lXBPqJG0iU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:69c1:b0:2af:53c6:5fb0 with SMTP id s59-20020a17090a69c100b002af53c65fb0mr4751229pjj.28.1714649373911; Thu, 02 May 2024 04:29:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240417232725.GC25080@gnu.wildebeest.org> <20240418173726.GD9069@redhat.com> <87v849qudy.fsf@tromey.com> <87wmooep76.fsf@tromey.com> <0347e05a-94c6-4ecc-aa8f-cc90358a813d@gmail.com> <0d0af1d9-21f8-4c60-ad4c-cd82c0c0cabb@redhat.com> <9580dbf5-5357-404c-b6f2-5e21fd369d3e@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 04:29:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans To: Richard Biener Cc: Jeff Law , Jason Merrill , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Overseers mailing list , Mark Wielaard , Joseph Myers , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Ian Lance Taylor via Gdb Reply-To: Ian Lance Taylor Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 11:48=E2=80=AFPM Richard Biener wrote: > > We'd only know for sure if we try. But then I'm almost 100% sure that > having to click in a GUI is slower than 'nrOK^X' in the text-mode mail UA > I am using for "quick" patch review. It might be comparable to the > review parts I do in the gmail UI or when I have to download attachments > and cut&paste parts into the reply. It might be also more convenient > for "queued" for review patches which just end up in New state in either > inbox. Gerritt does not require clicking in a GUI, though that is of course the more widely used option. Patches can be approved from the command line. > But then would using gitlab or any similar service enforce the use of > pull requests / forks for each change done or can I just continue to > post patches and push them from the command-line for changes I > can approve myself? Gerritt permits submitting patches from the command line for people who can self-approve. > Btw, for any forge like tool I'd even consider there'd be the requirement > that _all_ functionality is also accessible via a documented (stable) API= , > aka there's command-line tooling available or at least possible to write. True of Gerritt. Ian