From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id gUyXA9fETWA4HwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 04:09:59 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 010C21EF78; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 04:09:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A9D81E54D for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 04:09:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BD8386EC41; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:09:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 82BD8386EC41 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1615709397; bh=4+ow6dP+KSFYqlPpJ25UsaHPuBPL6mye+YrQ6dtLiDs=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=S5i+QRiUcqY3ZdsmTWrRuvQLz/zCJ0OtjK7EvrIsLzFwAgXM25/kl1VdBtn/wvIRw gI+wChtbDg3BDz63i+KZs3+qGnda/dNSiClzJTWcEepAtimLYZZoS/njYi2P3ickUU UBtShuj0TdqXCQ59c1vmgPM3qyPmrV2osZoQcmFQ= Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC1373851C29 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:09:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org AC1373851C29 Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id w18so13688606edc.0 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 00:09:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=J4JjSVGrbzr18vhuz9EzZtrprWPZdRmYvF8zZfu7gwo=; b=b3qP12VdiQRCAN7ZAaTCjhgG98qakXvSmiy+84Qjo28QZ4qynvu1yXVXVOSVJmJTjr pgZkqk6jfVejvhmT9gw8+vpP5MgHvOuVxlwdY7c9PqKw+adKoCooZ5yameBHF86SfJtw Yd7Z8vSttO6MCpUzXqoT534Z3dhNryByRl38UI5vMCnKq27dW3fpz9CbIx1oMYeigmx1 XL8h82T8hQXnW9xzcF8XlFM69B2Sji5n2bJC838OvrzSf1I+4aKELEWksvbUY9zXM46t N4ihr6njZN7d3ck44+4rLJYRnLw0XO+OF1Pa+Fmoj0PsqfS82Ryt8ZVqG8Z/8va0P2o4 dhvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531YwoDQbmkZntwswc5dp1X3QGBBjsNwNmThjFaKQBqe6TCxQJe5 C99b1L3aXbdEpoBJBiEmPAm3clYbiOyj2/rX8M5kIuMwhIs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5zO2je8lJ1I43gbD7hqm1mFITE0iancA+FWfDqtw5ecvO8y9QFCAP36Up9iXwwEAtu75YG6rewK9f/VMqmZg= X-Received: by 2002:a50:fd15:: with SMTP id i21mr23243505eds.384.1615709393385; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 00:09:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <83h7loun5e.fsf@gnu.org> <8335wzjuuk.fsf@gnu.org> <6005438b-e445-05f4-f063-d62016d2885a@polymtl.ca> <83pn02gufq.fsf@gnu.org> <87czw242h4.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83ft0ygoyi.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83ft0ygoyi.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 17:09:42 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Demangling in backtraces To: Reuben Thomas via Gdb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Nagmat Nazarov via Gdb Reply-To: Nagmat Nazarov Errors-To: gdb-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" How to unsubscribe from gdb@sourceware.org ? On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 5:04 PM Eli Zaretskii via Gdb wrote: > > From: Andreas Schwab > > Cc: Simon Marchi , Hannes Domani > > , Eli Zaretskii > > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:29:59 +0100 > > > > On M=C3=A4r 14 2021, Eli Zaretskii via Gdb wrote: > > > > > Thanks. So does this mean we don't have any kind of "manual > > > demangler" in GDB that could be turned on in cases like this, when > > > "just works" doesn't? Hannes, any ideas? > > > > (gdb) help demangle > > Demangle a mangled name. > > Usage: demangle [-l LANGUAGE] [--] NAME > > If LANGUAGE is not specified, NAME is demangled in the current language= . > > Sure, I know. I thought there could be some "set FOO" knob that would > demangle automatically in the backtraces. > > The above works, of course (one must use "-l c++", btw), but not if I > submit the "decorated" name, such as > "libgccjit-0!_Z17gimple_build_callP9tree_nodejz". > > Thanks. >