From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43371 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2018 13:20:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 43272 invoked by uid 89); 21 Apr 2018 13:20:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 13:20:31 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9sRI-0001zG-Va for gdb@sourceware.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 09:20:29 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9sRI-0001yh-Qm for gdb@sourceware.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 09:20:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45675) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f9sRI-0002cZ-EH for gdb@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 09:20:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9sRH-0001xa-Jd for gdb@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 09:20:28 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::231]:36042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9sRH-0001wQ-7T for gdb@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 09:20:27 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-x231.google.com with SMTP id q13-v6so12765261qtl.3 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 06:20:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s0MpydhwSMcsT4TkH8eTzXZQVC3lI7v0CzbxxFATdzw=; b=Ar3nWCih7BA8+ISNAo9bT01REHMFR+nfkzqj06YrJ9kMK12vlfRR3OVuVI3M7hyZ83 ojxsRBMHNghqyD7F7PVz3SboKM+n92iUa+Xzc42MOnTJ91H8+DfHapDyhm0+EQH13a+8 KhjQ8ugWL1Ewea4fRfNiKbI3weN7wEI+FZ7iHHtsos3IwkgFA1Im6/TWuioGklSFvyL4 VfML3Gg9Gp1C2DP0W3S0KZnaddm450kouCm7bXgpK/PIQKu0shPZbVZiE5+pYkZWCitP tf6SPO2ajn6X6/leEPh/lI6fWm+PkKwxu1c5TZa6wlu5gYyjjjOw6iZSVL3DB7YinSrO Cu1A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCMnfH22yIqd3VmFEekQEu7b7wDfUVRYZm8C0hTDcAntjz2l0O1 QAJzLyOQmnh3Xas3lyW9JJB73Ee6Nz6mq0kPol4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoQVVfuf7Sq7k9PGzW+F+B3jG8mVBbtTfRvItKl/bzWnUnOzLjLQZSGGZ9jcCrYcYADLqSzEKTlr/hggUChjcs= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:c89:: with SMTP id n9-v6mr15190894qti.362.1524316826444; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 06:20:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.216.8 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 06:20:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Ran Shalit Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 14:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Is it required to compile all libraries with toolchain used with gdb ? To: gdb , gdb@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 Hello, Is it required to compile all libraries with same toolchain which created the gdb/gdbserver. For example, I have in sysroot pthread.so, but it might have been compiled with other toolchian than the toolchain used for gdb/gdbserver. The main application, though is compiled with the same toolchin. Best regards, ranran From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43012 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2018 13:20:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 43000 invoked by uid 89); 21 Apr 2018 13:20:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:sk:gdb@sou X-HELO: mail-qt0-f178.google.com Received: from mail-qt0-f178.google.com (HELO mail-qt0-f178.google.com) (209.85.216.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 13:20:28 +0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f178.google.com with SMTP id b13-v6so12769518qtp.12 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 06:20:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s0MpydhwSMcsT4TkH8eTzXZQVC3lI7v0CzbxxFATdzw=; b=jU7C7KPWoINkoA5Ei0cz4Q7ldVrV5iluIsNHI7PPJ4zrK/grZDgOq9rkVk5+9eG0fg AuyfAtEQqzH5rjuoAML7vfKoIIz8dr0x/a0C7ggIOHgcZgjlpuvzCI1f5Nj+0kkWiBsE AgjhsEzrOcxK9UpxGDi9Ta9M4H8zO7sX+kAW55Z7ZhUdSP5A4eLvhh/WmMD3b+Es4/7V KrPvqBCfIQrXCAFyIscPfEtdSuyLKN/Doe/9rMyi10yJQnmX1lOVLfgkbWttWvjeJSQA 5G2jGdys1x2ssX2vUc2zU3c7hbOWyPHIiKpQoLoraXeQMPJJVN1paGYA9bTOwIhDZgPU Y7Zw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBJ9s+Yvj9MKgOUdLMob9IeBTdY1BzzgKtZeR443UgOUmlPn9w/ rFI7LXPMfb6xY53K7pHTsrLpP/YccV/hwBMJO4I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoQVVfuf7Sq7k9PGzW+F+B3jG8mVBbtTfRvItKl/bzWnUnOzLjLQZSGGZ9jcCrYcYADLqSzEKTlr/hggUChjcs= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:c89:: with SMTP id n9-v6mr15190894qti.362.1524316826444; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 06:20:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.216.8 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 06:20:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Ran Shalit Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 13:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Is it required to compile all libraries with toolchain used with gdb ? To: gdb , gdb@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20180421132000.eACKQxXvk3iOXQJXNEML1Bs3xN5WkqcCupFO6AE5GMY@z> Hello, Is it required to compile all libraries with same toolchain which created the gdb/gdbserver. For example, I have in sysroot pthread.so, but it might have been compiled with other toolchian than the toolchain used for gdb/gdbserver. The main application, though is compiled with the same toolchin. Best regards, ranran