From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-44806-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 111497 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2015 23:26:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 111455 invoked by uid 89); 10 Nov 2015 23:26:45 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_LOTSOFHASH,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wm0-f47.google.com
Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f47.google.com) (74.125.82.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:26:44 +0000
Received: by wmdw130 with SMTP id w130so92285720wmd.0        for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:26:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.170.19 with SMTP id t19mr6920298wme.65.1447198001438; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:26:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.59.65 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:26:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHR0xd6NgsRELcdpbmVjGGQusv756kWMwj5G+NpWE_oN1ErBHA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHR0xd6NgsRELcdpbmVjGGQusv756kWMwj5G+NpWE_oN1ErBHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAHR0xd6ewc1mQPa=si85=acf3Miuw5Yg6H3tPgKRXNb=1xSZDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How are watchpoints handled? (remote serial)
From: Juha Aaltonen <turbopultti@gmail.com>
To: gdb-mailing list <gdb@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2

Maybe that's a bug in gdb-multiarch 7.7.1?
Remote-debugging an ARM (watch g_testloc):

(This is as it should be.)
gdbarch_dump: have_nonsteppable_watchpoint =3D 1


w \x00]0x00008180 in __delay_169 () at ../blinky.c:211
211                g_testloc =3D 1;
(gdb) cont
Continuing.
Sending packet:
$m81b0,4#c8...[\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][=
\x00][
r +]Ack
[$][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][#][8][0]Packet received: 00000000
[
w \x00]Sending packet:
$Z2,81b0,4#13...[\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00=
][\x00][\x00][\x00][
r +]Ack
[$][O][K][#][9][a]Packet received: OK
[
w \x00]Sending packet: $c#63...[\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][
r +]Ack
[$][T][0][5][#][b][9]Packet received: T05
[
w \x00]Sending packet: $g#67...[\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][
r +]Ack
[$][8][8][1][3][0][0][0][0][2][c][0][1][0][0][0][0][8][8][1][3][0][0][0][0]=
[0][1][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][a][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][3][0][0][0][0][0][0][e]=
[8][0][3][0][0][0][0][b][0][8][1][0][0][0][0][2][c][0][a][0][2][1][f][2][3]=
[0][0][0][0][0][0][2][8][0][a][0][2][1][f][2][4][0][a][0][2][1][f][4][3][0]=
[c][0][1][1][f][a][0][9][7][0][0][0][0][8][0][8][1][0][0][0][0][8][0][8][1]=
[0][0][0][0][0][9][0][0][0][0][9][0][0][9][0][0][0][0][9][0][0][9][0][0][0]=
[0][9][0][0][9][0][0][0][0][9][0][0][9][0][0][0][0][9][0][0][9][0][0][0][0]=
[9][0][0][9][0][0][0][0][9][0][0][9][0][0][0][0][9][0][0][9][0][0][0][0][9]=
[0][9][7][0][1][0][0][6][0][#][2][4]Packet
received: 881300002c01000088130000010000000a00000003000000e8030000b08100002=
c0a021f23000000280a021f240a021f430c011fa09700008081000080810000090000900900=
00900900009009000090090000900900009009000090090000900900009097010060
[
w \x00]Sending packet:
$m8180,4#9e...[\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][=
\x00][
r +]Ack
[$][0][0][3][0][8][7][e][5][#][c][c]Packet received: 003087e5
[
... (lots of memory reads) ...
[
w \x00]Sending packet:
$m8180,4#9e...[\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][=
\x00][
r +]Ack
[$][0][0][3][0][8][7][e][5][#][c][c]Packet received: 003087e5
[
w \x00]
Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
Sending packet:
$z2,81b0,4#33...[\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00][\x00=
][\x00][\x00][\x00][
r +]Ack
[$][O][K][#][9][a]Packet received: OK
[
w \x00]0x00008180 in __delay_169 () at ../blinky.c:211
211                g_testloc =3D 1;
(gdb)


No stepping over watchpoint.


On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Juha Aaltonen <turbopultti@gmail.com> wro=
te:
> How should the watchpoints be handled by remote stub/server?
> It seems that when 'cont'-command is given, gdb re-installs watchpoint
> and sends 'c'-packet.
>
> If the return address is the trap address, the watchpoint trigs again,
> but if the address is advanced,
> the access is not done at all, because the watchpoint makes exception
> before the access is made.