From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-44813-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 55923 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2015 22:41:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 55899 invoked by uid 89); 11 Nov 2015 22:41:09 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wm0-f53.google.com
Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f53.google.com) (74.125.82.53) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:41:03 +0000
Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so67000951wme.1        for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:41:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.191.229 with SMTP id hb5mr12735049wjc.123.1447281660367; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:41:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.59.65 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:41:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHR0xd4r0de6HXkQqZErYgSV=KEyA5t=B=eER+XAofpewTvuaw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHR0xd5T2T7AAUa2iDP-pc4hHNY+=Or42LA1GDW9s62=P6mmcg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAHR0xd4r0de6HXkQqZErYgSV=KEyA5t=B=eER+XAofpewTvuaw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:41:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAHR0xd65Oue5iLqrZmF7TSwZbSx7RaNa9Un70YGjXU1vXXwMyg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: remote supporting 'swbreak' and 'hwbreak' ?
From: Juha Aaltonen <turbopultti@gmail.com>
To: gdb-mailing list <gdb@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2

Oh, and from the gdb server sources I also saw that 'hwbreak' only
applies to HW breakpoints and has nothing to do with HW watchpoints.


On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Juha Aaltonen <turbopultti@gmail.com> wrote:
> Found it in the gdb server sources: ';' was missing from the end.
> I thought it was a separator, that shouldn't be there after last item.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Juha Aaltonen <turbopultti@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If a remote 'agent' supports 'swbreak' and 'hwbreak', what's the
>> correct "syntax" for T05-packet?
>>
>> And is 'hwbreak+' needed in qSupported response if only SW breakpoints
>> and HW watchpoints are supported (not actual HW breakpoints)?
>>
>> I've tried 'T05swbreak" with and without single quotes around swbreak,
>> and with and without colon, but gdb always complains about malformed
>> packet.
>>
>>
>> I'm using "GNU gdb (Debian 7.10-1) 7.10".