From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-44812-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 52307 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2015 22:39:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 52289 invoked by uid 89); 11 Nov 2015 22:39:35 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wm0-f52.google.com
Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f52.google.com) (74.125.82.52) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:39:34 +0000
Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so66963173wme.1        for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:39:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.4.212 with SMTP id 203mr13979783wme.89.1447281571597; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:39:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.59.65 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:39:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHR0xd5T2T7AAUa2iDP-pc4hHNY+=Or42LA1GDW9s62=P6mmcg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHR0xd5T2T7AAUa2iDP-pc4hHNY+=Or42LA1GDW9s62=P6mmcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:39:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAHR0xd4r0de6HXkQqZErYgSV=KEyA5t=B=eER+XAofpewTvuaw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: remote supporting 'swbreak' and 'hwbreak' ?
From: Juha Aaltonen <turbopultti@gmail.com>
To: gdb-mailing list <gdb@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2

Found it in the gdb server sources: ';' was missing from the end.
I thought it was a separator, that shouldn't be there after last item.


On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Juha Aaltonen <turbopultti@gmail.com> wrote:
> If a remote 'agent' supports 'swbreak' and 'hwbreak', what's the
> correct "syntax" for T05-packet?
>
> And is 'hwbreak+' needed in qSupported response if only SW breakpoints
> and HW watchpoints are supported (not actual HW breakpoints)?
>
> I've tried 'T05swbreak" with and without single quotes around swbreak,
> and with and without colon, but gdb always complains about malformed
> packet.
>
>
> I'm using "GNU gdb (Debian 7.10-1) 7.10".