From: Ofir Cohen <ofircohenn@gmail.com>
To: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Cc: Ofir Cohen <ofircohenn@gmail.com>
Subject: False positive permanent breakpoints
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHOBVAcv7fui8+tg2w8mYP0_2J0FqSj8arp5Oc_dihGRLysv7Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hello,
We have debugging support for code running on the iGPU, and we've encountered
something that looks like a limitation of gdb.
Problem: gdb freaks out on the iGPU when trying to step over/continue when
stopped on a permanent breakpoint.
Root-cause: gdb *falsely* identifies some instructions as permanent breakpoints.
Details
======
We don't call set_gdbarch_skip_permanent_breakpoint() on our target, so there
is no support for stepping over permanent breakpoints. Which is fine
since software breakpoints is not something that we support at the
moment.
While trying to fix the root-cause,
i.e. let gdb determine that instruction is indeed a breakpoint instruction,
I ran into a wall.
Looks like gdb is being too *coarse* for the check (whether it is a
breakpoint instruction):
if (err || memcmp (buf, bp_opcode (bp), bp_size (bp)) != 0)
in validate_inserted_breakpoint() function.
I'm saying coarse here because on the iGPU the breakpoint thingy is mandated
by a single bit, and does not have a unique *opcode*.
Proposed solution
==============
Could we abstract (delegate away) this predicate to the _target_ ?
Perhaps setting a default handler for other targets.
Thanks,
Ofir
next reply other threads:[~2016-10-26 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-26 14:04 Ofir Cohen [this message]
2016-10-26 14:28 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-26 14:42 ` Ofir Cohen
2016-10-26 14:50 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-26 15:02 ` Ofir Cohen
2016-10-26 15:14 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-26 15:25 ` Ofir Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHOBVAcv7fui8+tg2w8mYP0_2J0FqSj8arp5Oc_dihGRLysv7Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ofircohenn@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox