From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 41669 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2016 10:01:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 41657 invoked by uid 89); 2 Sep 2016 10:01:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=brobecker, Brobecker, U*brobecker, sk:brobeck X-HELO: mail-oi0-f47.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f47.google.com) (209.85.218.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:01:32 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id p186so119106303oia.2 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 03:01:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J03UUptZl75HtXiDyoOpDNQGD0LChf0sF98XUiXX2AM=; b=FsS/DYMMkrK+UNS2ld86Vwvs6+2oVkdhGk3i8EYoXLOx/qZCUI3KZ98UKaCwkxnRTu bl0uyEsa5oNluMlXEpJnGKx1fvYFk00vWFSshWLyip8HH4W8wd1IvrNE+k6fFEr8zOqJ 9M4uKyylPfVG2FUDHcSw+M9LuHVfdUL8di5hzeG2ptsugEWakq7KXD2LuzxLUe4SZaGv i/oTka2xrwpP4Ic5V1KM5oNWlj78iKkfQqKlWCYJNm3lAiTLrYTS8BdwOUArJdMCi1Lw GDBzJLgmk74FIn9pXabGcFjgoP1N4AQbW8b1IvM1/4JXGsc9x2/wX3DdYikpBKM5XPSx elqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwM/wqiBVJByTAr2l7L71QtfkrYBK+1C69E7gwvwSGDQg2k/AN2nmzzKVl7e2YtOMXr80NMKulPeAqr3Kw== X-Received: by 10.157.23.162 with SMTP id j31mr20660451otj.74.1472810490715; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 03:01:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.79.201 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 03:01:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160901181739.GR4538@adacore.com> References: <212bc30a-e6ad-886b-0881-8206dd91b933@redhat.com> <20160901181739.GR4538@adacore.com> From: Yao Qi Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Go C++ only To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Pedro Alves , "gdb@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Joel Brobecker wrot= e: > > I don't have a strong opinion, but can we perhaps try a compromise > where we would be using C++ features only in new units (unlikely to be > backported)? Even though the backporting rate is indeed probably low, > it would still be nice to make it as easy as possible. Or is this > not really a practical suggestion? > I agree. If we think the patch is likely to be backported, such as bug fix, C++ feature is not allowed in the patch. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)