Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Wakely via Gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>
To: Eric Gallager <egall@gwmail.gwu.edu>
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>,
	binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,  gdb@sourceware.org,
	newlib@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	 forge@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Sourceware forge experiment
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 21:02:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdTjpwB0m1VR69+fYi7R7EGdfvb8uWR+1UqvBe8DrM7ZqQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMfHzOu83FihjWQ0bkFVN8QxQnbUi=BwmKdo8npCXQWnYSLZAw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 at 20:44, Eric Gallager <egall@gwmail.gwu.edu> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 9:27 PM Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> wrote:
> >
> > As an experiment Sourceware is now running an forgejo v9 instance at
> > https://forge.sourceware.org
> >
> > Everybody with an @sourceware.org, @cygwin.com or @gcc.gnu.org address
> > can register an account (please use the same user name as your account
> > name).
> >
> > The setup has disabled most "extras" (no badges, stars, issues, wikis,
> > packages, timetracking, milestones, etc.). And users can only fork
> > existing repos (it has mirrors of various sourceware projects).
>
> Is the intent to get mirrors of all of them on there at some point?
>

It's an experiment for people who want to try it out, I don't really see
why every project needs to be mirrored there. If nobody from project xyz is
interested in experimenting with forgejo, why bother mirroring that
project's repo?

I'm only seeing a few at the moment...
>
> > Some things haven't been setup yet (external trackers/bugzilla, incoming
> > email, ci, etc.)
>
> I was able to get the link to an external tracker (the gcc bugzilla)
> set up in my "gcc-mirror" fork:
> https://forge.sourceware.org/egallager/gcc-mirror
>
> >
> > The full setup can be found in this git repository:
> > https://sourceware.org/cgit/forge/
> >
> > For now it is only open for existing maintainers/developers for
> > experimentating with a pull-request model.
>
> So, I tested this out: I forked the gcc-mirror and gcc-wwwdocs-mirror
> repos, but it looks like the mirror ones aren't accepting PRs at the
> moment, so I tried forking their "-TEST" variants, but it looks like
> it won't let me make a fork of the "-TEST" copy since I already have a
> fork of the "-mirror" one? When I click the "fork" button on one of
> the "-TEST" repos, it just redirects me back to my existing "-mirror"
> fork of the corresponding "-mirror" one...
>

Go to the -mirror project's settings and delete the repo. You'll be able to
fork the -TEST one after that.


>
> > We can add others as long as they understand this is an experiment
> > and does not mean projects are accepting patches through it.
> > Contributions should still be sent through the mailinglists.
> >
> > There is also a new mailinglist for discussion about the setup and the
> > best way to create a pull-request workflow. Please subscribe if you
> > create an account and mention which project/organization you would
> > like do some experiments for. We can then add you to that organization.
> >
>
> ...is subscribing necessary? I'm trying to limit my subscriptions...
>

> > https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/forge
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-24 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-21  1:22 Mark Wielaard
2024-10-24 15:29 ` Automatic URLs in forgejo? (was Re: Sourceware forge experiment) David Malcolm via Gdb
2024-10-24 15:36   ` Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gdb
2024-10-24 15:42   ` Jonathan Wakely via Gdb
2024-10-24 15:43     ` Jonathan Wakely via Gdb
2024-10-24 19:44 ` Sourceware forge experiment Eric Gallager via Gdb
2024-10-24 20:02   ` Jonathan Wakely via Gdb [this message]
2024-11-08 13:07   ` Mark Wielaard
2024-10-24 20:25 ` Andrew Pinski via Gdb
2024-10-24 20:29   ` Andrew Pinski via Gdb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAH6eHdTjpwB0m1VR69+fYi7R7EGdfvb8uWR+1UqvBe8DrM7ZqQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=egall@gwmail.gwu.edu \
    --cc=forge@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=newlib@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox