From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id UFYjBGCd22g3ixkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 05:05:36 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=SZ59xBhf; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0111A1E0B6; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 05:05:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DC071E047 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 05:05:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19A8385700E for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 09:05:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E19A8385700E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1759223134; bh=NspfTVaw81jdwijgbGJKNFvOXIu2a/GYrUIdbOQc/7o=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=SZ59xBhf7gFUfqRg+pkdK6GL1aJRHe039jKpRJhyepqva4/4T6802ipzzn3o+FD+W nInyVrHN725YN+jD+SdmYnRbB1+J3TLSaSKDSl2lMiSa2v+vx5Etrl6PFFcuR8BYPC ofZD80QqXb2m7nGPOiPsMoG2rZfl3MdQBGsqCLko= Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C9B73858291 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 09:04:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 9C9B73858291 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 9C9B73858291 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759223082; cv=none; b=M3EactpQZ/5YotFryPQyVwTTYkCuwzOK+Vo7MH91Ktdf1ighf4NynRL7GVyuTS1+zZIu4oWyKkA0AR38sT2AQvw/1vn1eFtisp4UZZIPuThmIjSPN7Zpt+FWBv4GzWqKubWjMRENp6DZblL+SxHGP07GCYl0RQH3rhtv2vb0cQo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759223082; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rgtIH+3lkagrJ5jkrPmTBMLHQm2xsadyf7wc/gSbtz4=; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=drcX8lnNqBC5WpT1XI1c9GDtgcX2/n/UcQRb1qNdzovaSQGocqi3y8dnGatKCyfO3f4hMzh+7KHVcElucT0bhAlG79sysIWIN+79TrA2tq1HVfruBp5dbLh5XAgSOa7ZreCOZWBZC5iDwMHjC/MjwWSsUtEp66oWGQMcY7IMsak= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9C9B73858291 Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-57992ba129eso6694587e87.3 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 02:04:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1759223081; x=1759827881; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=NspfTVaw81jdwijgbGJKNFvOXIu2a/GYrUIdbOQc/7o=; b=eKrmSRCGmnYxHAS2qlRy9GHJlu+MsXra9e6kxi3FR4bQ2YRE8RL70fCJem7peXEKBt wUVR9A9e4mcbw6yi1cw8oWeXURnNdIc2hpRVF/Mxf5CcC3DGNVkaWWA+wgIJnd7WYZna v2vfkAc2tSsqoq7NAAFIS1xJJxP4RUAyg4u5o1tV5q88pciLrpG4SVMgJHbTE27Vm6PE NMFUB/hFN++dM4k1Yw9NrwO/qqRYl3wO47eX+S1WOT1lhz1852DkQJoO2lwfubRWhteT SSZt/dIuAPS6Qpe/vOd2DyCjd0Cqyip2PIDJTYuw00pEwlnK/7TALumLCEnG7YS/qGLV GoKQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWuzY8Sab2/DOcEHAfRxbtRU2hAmEV49KctBbJdEHzKishAY+okCbbHqh3UPoZMLe7+hWI=@sourceware.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxBYznkbMyIfFpdXKuGREHqCcduL80GMotiYekxBIMinXYjNlcL SmPyPWU0XKlJDZaRb3VDV5UT0w0pSOe31FW154WyvQG0GHC8P/ggERvB3NCmBinsJgJVBCJk4kY togk1GPvza9Betkv2b2ykyghYu0+71FU= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu3SIX05SLX1olz9dkybL443G4ffBrdJ+wtxrEXqfoyiwD1YAAXTiG4fS5lRNc fEVX5o1VIk/0tmRaUtppI6qo4+Ru1bHDCYXQO/9DC60pU/DC3K3FU43rG6LjOAZMRlAhX2atxz9 nW6po4hqimkiLf5WAjMRH7D+5QB7vBThmqua+VVZjeSJrfn+YfaBWX7dw5vq76fou+JE2VOwPQF fLjMEBUnDCSWJyCCFCbhUFcttuaIvRKltJgnwcrYw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH0Mfso2HkWME6aY3YKwoePX7Jy+8m/sWHUxlndVWU0vWE/zpynP4sTruq9noNhT4Pii1dfaPV/QKBmizgdOgk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:e9b:b0:57a:e5cc:93a9 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-582d32097bcmr6005151e87.44.1759223080720; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 02:04:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87wm5g2xcr.fsf@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:04:29 +0100 X-Gm-Features: AS18NWDE7mHLG4E6v1jAIX0ntE_4mSKDVPhjnLFO3C2qiyhEFBV9mt08Z6AjlWA Message-ID: Subject: Re: bugzilla keyword for beginner issues to work on To: Dhruv Chawla Cc: Sam James , Andrew Pinski , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, guinevere@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Jonathan Wakely via Gdb Reply-To: Jonathan Wakely Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 09:39, Dhruv Chawla via Gcc wrote: > > On 30/09/25 13:19, Sam James via Gcc wrote: > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > > > > Andrew Pinski writes: > > > >> Hi all, > >> As talked about during the GNU tools cauldron, the gdb and gcc > >> keywords usage here are different but folks mentioned it would be a > >> good idea to have the same between the 2 bugzilla instances. Right now > >> gcc is easyhack while gdb uses good-first-bug. Both have issues with > >> the naming of each. > > > > 'good-first-*' is what people tend to search for in other > > projects. Having it aligned (and optimising for new contributors) makes > > sense, I think. > > > >> [...] > > > > sam > > +1 to this. I feel like "beginner-improvement" and "easyhack" are harder to > parse than "good-first-bug" or "good-first-issue" (which LLVM uses FWIW), and > it is not immediately obvious to me what either of them mean. Yeah, I really don't care that somebody might decide to work on a "good first issue" as their second or third issue. It would still a good first one for somebody else, it just happens to be that person's second or third. "beginner-improvement" is too long, and I had the same question as Florian about who or what is being improved.