From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id k3LROJGsEmbECicAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 07 Apr 2024 10:24:17 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=gozdnMMm; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D4BDB1E0C0; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 10:24:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCD941E030 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 10:24:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531B43858C3A for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 14:24:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 531B43858C3A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1712499855; bh=lbjd7xNaBHgrb6qtKpd2RxZNAwS2GMYyAsfZcNzn1Rc=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=gozdnMMmzI7NPTgZrXcSqu3oR4VlB49MVwC6BMIa036+hA+QgdzGPgDL9kFA42jnK 68Nr3qa86lPqrfXn2hJV5kQv2OzCe5DpM15QE1ZgpotHMyUil3oZAt3kbfV91PQmeK vEQtc74y3dCbPoylAcoJ2/3vDgY1nxjZehQP/jwM= Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557E13858C32; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 14:20:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 557E13858C32 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 557E13858C32 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712499658; cv=none; b=N6aCjBRmBkHiShF8BoHRUCYB3x6onEKhrFAsjlxHG/5l95uYp825NqribosMvIQG3JBKSLJql5BhyCa746mMAzKhydskNVbO93ohlpMrb05RE5w3NfvaZbQqaLdK2/2A0eUUIK95F+xF29/IP8Iq1c6uP/5TxalEpzciCIi7iOI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712499658; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zDM3el0Cnpm7dBdUextXqNVidnj5UyyNoviz7mHGCzY=; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=sdw2wRBn5OW5JGySW+Xe/iZ3MYbVJ3NwV6zHWxyvoTtMAL3u71paCXLSYjbHolNd3x5APzAdCCDa2JxcmF3pUwLZ7nDK9W+Vo8o6SWkmoNTBOUZdgTonxoMgB8noAWuaqpLZswTCFQzZibJ4U8DXPchnuSEdOutJ5Ina9w3Dfgg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a4715991c32so519075166b.1; Sun, 07 Apr 2024 07:20:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712499655; x=1713104455; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=zDM3el0Cnpm7dBdUextXqNVidnj5UyyNoviz7mHGCzY=; b=mTvO21MAfLUAXVGzJfWzcUIo2/DOfzWDJ6VWCuhywR5aW9rrgJGwFYGYtYi3pW4TPB 6BuefzMHnM/cF0avcuY9vKHd8EbiUGprxaeggsKDH+HMDSsCvAmmD/JBmTl9AUFI5cU7 xqZgHo1kwkz5EhBeJUsPNhm9OgVI4rgKsVFQxdCp2YciM/BYk9zqaGTkqWo75GRG4j7b 7b4AXr6ap8CFmYkx4wmksSkPpiS2JsToPhxK+T47VeAg/ikyRJg3xNYxP6PCviaCgPC7 TaZ0tNJ7xT3fkoHS/0ZPUyL0jmzLafcCDTjqusZSv6foV5mGCxRdAwIe0BY38VVvQim4 yTBg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW8epzmKpccLP4ORcJe3ygPv1BtWy12yP3DxS/1juaJyoCisICUa+Ly+9Moa/tv2UrTMJgad7/9ZXDtQs719FTLF/+ZH2kKxecXih5qnKlFb8O8O/wiHnRb3KZ7 X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzjskxxth/LuEv/aNg5+klL7phH9uNqEbPSDQ/wcbATgAAV1ZCy E0fF3bDX4aDgX9E69L562IehnSOjhi9WvcWb8iAh4Dafd9OztiWqXNofR96/DoJQxpPujW6GH83 CQ7jDtwvUpU0V48ULdt/eg9rktik= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGnavLmesLffO1ONKZ1ZG5hDTNgI0KsDkR6vsEgDGZSzJjusUJWz/TNF+CZ3+yHm8fmH/dD631asqEVMnCr9y0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c14a:b0:a51:d5ce:b79e with SMTP id dp10-20020a170906c14a00b00a51d5ceb79emr183896ejc.47.1712499654731; Sun, 07 Apr 2024 07:20:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240404213501.GL19937@gnu.wildebeest.org> <20240407140215.GO1292@gnu.wildebeest.org> In-Reply-To: <20240407140215.GO1292@gnu.wildebeest.org> Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 15:20:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patches submission policy change To: Mark Wielaard Cc: Christophe Lyon , Binutils , GCC Mailing List , gdb@sourceware.org, Nick Clifton , Richard Biener , Jakub Jelinek , Joel Brobecker , "Carlos O'Donell" , Maxim Kuvyrkov , Thiago Bauermann , Adhemerval Zanella X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.30 X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Jonathan Wakely via Gdb Reply-To: Jonathan Wakely Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Sun, 7 Apr 2024, 15:02 Mark Wielaard, wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:32:11PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gdb wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, 22:36 Mark Wielaard, wrote: > > > wrt to the mailinglists maybe getting larger patches, I think most > > > will still be under 400K and I wouldn't raise the limit (because most > > > such larger emails are really just spam). But we might want to get > > > more mailinglist moderators. > > > > > > gcc-patches, binutils and gdb-patches all have only one moderator > > > (Jeff, Ian and Thiago). It would probably be good if there were > > > more. > > > > > > Any volunteers? It shouldn't be more than 1 to 3 emails a week > > > (sadly most of them spam). > > > > I'm happy to help moderating/spambusting for the GCC lists. > > I see you are already doing that for the libstdc++ mailinglist, but > you are the only moderator. Maybe you want someone as backup there? > It wouldn't hurt to have backup if somebody wants to volunteer, but I don't remember ever having to moderate anything for that list. Maybe just once. > The jit mailinglist is the same. It only has one moderator > (David). Having a second/backup one would probably be nice. Are you ok > to be added there? > Sure! I imagine that one is quiet as well. > (I see that both the libstdc++ and jit mailinglist just allow up to > 5MB patches, which probably means they don't block any legitimate > ones, but might get a bit more spam than necessary). > > It isn't a patches mailinglist, so slightly less urgent, but the > gcc-help mailinglist doesn't have any moderators. Would you be willing > to help out with that one? > Sure, I'm subscribed and active there anyway.