Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Triple Yang <triple.yang@gmail.com>
To: "Petr Hluzín" <petr.hluzin@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: What role does gdb/remote.c play?
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGxstLQzkq=iotg+crPx_9ROz+PM=XQuZK=0G6Ef7WNC0LSTGg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC=yr6DEY=C4VJSeHPQm6r8nZad=P88qpN83xGs1F7K_o2Mu3Q@mail.gmail.com>

2011/8/15 Petr Hluzín <petr.hluzin@gmail.com>:
> On 15 August 2011 17:09, Triple Yang <triple.yang@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2011/8/15 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>:
>>> On Monday 15 August 2011 12:51:11, Triple Yang wrote:
>>>
>>>> Then, if I want to create a new remote target, should I just modify
>>>> remote.c or reuse codes in it?
>>>
>>> I don't know what your new target does, so I can't answer that for you.
>>>
>>>> How do I map command 'target remote' to the new target I created?
>>>
>>> You don't.  Do you _really_ need to implement a new target in gdb?
>>> Why not teach the remote end the RSP instead?  Then you can
>>> use "target remote", without adding new code to gdb.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, because I am trying porting GDB to a new architecture prototype.
>> Implementing a new target seems to be the only way to achieve the
>> purpose.
>
> If your users want to debug programs running on a remote
> machine/device then you can either:
> A: override "target remote" (or other target) implementation in GDB
> and use custom communication or
> B: use GDB's remote protocol, modify gdbserver sources and write your
> own handling or
> C: use GDB's remote protocol and write your own parsing and handling
>
> The option A is not recommended (see Pedro Alves) because it either
> means you will be distributing your own GDB or be stuck to FSF release
> schedule. Also users of older gdbs will not be able to connect (plus
> users will get misleading diagnostic). And there is a lot of code in
> gdb and many ways to get lost.
>
> For options B and C the user would type "target remote" and it will
> behave the way users expect from other archs (as the case may be),
> what tutorials describe and what IDEs do well.
>

So in option B or C, will reusing codes in remote.c be satisfying?
(Thus I may save some time in writing codes parsing/wrapping RSP
packets.)

>> To "teach the remote end the RSP instead", what needs to be done?
>
> On remote system do create a listening TCP socket and implement
> processing the remote protocol commands [1]. The gdbserver does that
> for several architectures and can serve as an inspiration.
>
> [1] http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/Remote-Protocol.html
>
> --
> Petr Hluzin
>

Best regards.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-15 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-15  9:08 yongyong.yang
2011-08-15 10:10 ` Pedro Alves
2011-08-15 11:51   ` Triple Yang
2011-08-15 13:32     ` Pedro Alves
2011-08-15 15:10       ` Triple Yang
2011-08-15 15:26         ` Andrew Burgess
2011-08-15 17:48           ` Triple Yang
2011-08-15 15:28         ` Pedro Alves
     [not found]           ` <CAGxstLS4BjPZOatfSMMUiVNpOyd9gVzdVXbzqUqBzvb1M9gsjw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-08-15 17:54             ` Triple Yang
2011-08-15 15:46         ` Petr Hluzín
2011-08-15 18:20           ` Triple Yang [this message]
2011-08-15 20:13             ` Petr Hluzín

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGxstLQzkq=iotg+crPx_9ROz+PM=XQuZK=0G6Ef7WNC0LSTGg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=triple.yang@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=petr.hluzin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox