From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C4CA385E006 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 22:45:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 2C4CA385E006 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sifive.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=jimw@sifive.com Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jHbG9-0003oI-Vk for gdb@sourceware.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:45:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41427) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jHbG9-0004Da-Fa for gdb@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:45:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jHbG8-0003m5-H7 for gdb@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:45:57 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mail-vs1-xe36.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::e36]:35003) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jHbG8-0003l6-3h for gdb@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:45:56 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-xe36.google.com with SMTP id u11so5065399vsg.2 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:45:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ouMoUnLVF8rE3l0RPvOk6LTcKsnJc7w6KhVRoGjNTp8=; b=P2kjpUSbLqdykb+3vbiDVbRLVUBbG5OfInvUZeUtSrFRcIdHnvAZCg4zY7gS9un3Fu mmIthz8aakpjxuFV34SO4+/ODTLkZTP75EHVb1x3lDN8/oO+ZHASMO0JVvmh+Wp8Ir/W FH4WnCxClVJ9D1EQ5nYNOnRCoBWB1hnCFxTyddJyAOXghw7qte99OW/q5x4Uc6NLnmSL LZMTS5ddo4yFA86+MCYjgKxJuti0gWp+ZPtq8sZXOwUtEeZQmvo2vFI1bR58KpyU6KPr Jmp7Gc8ifBhKqXoJPxauC7DrkLrD+TjxyUrkDjMu2+RGEAFRNFo+8K+FmYNlToTdZXLs 7a6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ouMoUnLVF8rE3l0RPvOk6LTcKsnJc7w6KhVRoGjNTp8=; b=stDy/vTm9WLUMXdHj8wuyHPnfJphBpCzooKP9p2suSvUm9rxwhi5dbI9Av/j7RMnSl Z8lmau2DZZrtwGGkJeWp9xbNqxf22UiFkjIVxYX9NNHhp9GYk7xZ3hRQB4HsAEQ1G0vw PVmivP4DMdhP5KEPzNMY3eVYmjdd+KpBBko7fNhu/Y5iBGSetqq/Wuyj5N+tnlNYYwmG zyI/8BFOp2IgqV8erxcIUbYuUEecwHwHyh4TbyFfb714RiqBOAc6GLlTs6PpD8oGa9/2 3Hbz3eX1HoJPa3b3s2rbkArvEUTy+jZCzg/sXrhte+/5VN9TYeRH3TclF11koKNG1RGc WQjg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2g2CzsPNuzBFQ1fJDdTtZZH5eiKlxcFmPITsSKKEEi2OuIAzJX EEQ26E+qdA/0jET9YoX1BHMNFuJdq8evclYZKGnKRw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuws6mitnMaCPolNVWPQdP6sByaV+pdfkGNh3HASijge/gN/Gn971OkuPt6NeBv9O9+UvaTMPtjH7pHBt7fTCc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:104b:: with SMTP id h11mr9369128vsq.182.1585262755093; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:45:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1133848898.4146549.1585164426040@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jim Wilson Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:45:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GDB 9.1 Fails to Build on Cygwin To: joel@rtems.org Cc: Hannes Domani , "gdb@gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e36 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 22:46:02 -0000 On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:24 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > Thanks for confirming this isn't just us seeing it. I haven't seen it yet; I rarely do cygwin development. I just recognize the problem as similar to one I fixed in the RISC-V bfd port. > Jim.. do you mind if I cc' you on the bug when I file it? Yes, that is fine. Jim