From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id +NJTLAvaCmHsGwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 14:18:51 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id B1E851EDE3; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 14:18:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B42301E79C for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 14:18:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C436395200D for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:18:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3C436395200D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1628101130; bh=0UFAbnmFrP/7HlVz6e5fUgZO/Ze6bqZKTrSJyJOvvII=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=We3C3ERv3RzWVkhno4yOPqvc12A/Y0PSUVY/fsgEdrx4kCdm8gGj61OjX5D4sQHHE teiEvHu/Yj2deTlzBxXEa0RAQKhUQQeYaYRbb709LpfQbp59SonpU//dDMNXP4xl7Z osvfl7F9StFdiyaHZXgkxN5r92jO2wk4GYM69VAU= Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E1B73857005 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:18:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3E1B73857005 Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id u13so3608742lje.5 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 11:18:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=20v0J2iB1OcoOii+WgO/M7m2rfuyRaojNWuuQ7kuPMg=; b=udoIm4kcUabGktqd3gvHoqJ3oAOoAUbo3/CEEmz7sEiYA6VXS51zp2JWRJ89GENS37 kmIje8fdIRH22SGhYP7TCzE0GUUOZe9n8FSNXEW8YpUN5DiK6I3E45dAq+TVNUJ601gb u2q7Ab584uB7phW8cORLpPccmeVNj8tzxTLYI7GN82m/xBAChiU15bXZNMpltEy2Z8Ho e1lM4mz9yzruyDXhD9TrcIu5/894zeKfBR5QL7eyLgo2bQBtZ9zC9nHC/Y8VOTLW1nNp r4fEwmlctMP5dVSV9eU0n2Pv7+JR37518Zqd/b704X4S7EBLYo7A6R+CRWe0ibCR8qt3 M/dw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530F1e8AuB/vlWdms6cBGTcEPCscw95bNslcYrpxgu+wwVZXM7Zh E5O+dEriN+I3QM+QxvSBNVq30t49H1cwUZvj5Og= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwUy4hxP+7CMGycNKEMsmFImrSPR4R8DP/zRH0CS5uPVcrlvwursp94shKRMD+AT3dlzRvudpEujv3EROFNCHc= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:22c6:: with SMTP id i189mr459299lji.378.1628101102884; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 11:18:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:18:10 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: offlist - QNX Assignment Paperwork To: Simon Marchi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Joel Sherrill via Gdb Reply-To: Joel Sherrill Cc: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Oh well. Not the worst thing I've ever done. :) Since it was mentioned that the assignment paperwork was old, I just wanted to make sure it still was valid given the corporate changes. I was NOT questioning anyone's intent about submitting. Again sorry. --joel On Wed, Aug 4, 2021, 1:06 PM Simon Marchi wrote: > On 2021-08-04 1:56 p.m., Simon Marchi via Gdb wrote: > > On 2021-08-04 1:33 p.m., Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> I didn't want to post this online but QNX has changed corporate hands > >> at least twice over the past couple of decades. Is the assignment > >> paperwork still binding? > >> > >> Wikipedia shows 2004 and 2010 changes in ownership.along with some > >> corporate name changes. > >> > >> I honestly have no idea how any of that impacts the assignment > >> paperwork but wanted to ask if this is something the FSF should > >> comment on. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> --joel > >> RTEMS > >> > > > > No idea, I'm not involved with copyright assignment processes at all > > (other than looking up the file). Hopefully Stephen will contact the > > FSF to clarify that. > > > > Simon > > And note that this was onlist, despite your suggest. At least you > didn't say anything incriminating ;). > > Simon >