From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id sO7rLmEwJ2au7TgAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:52:01 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=YhF1cKEP; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id BADC81E0C0; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:52:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A58A51E030 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:51:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FED4384DD00 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 03:51:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2FED4384DD00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1713844319; bh=6aKzXirXt7fHlE+o29Pwa18xnZEURFthWL12R4TZU5w=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=YhF1cKEPR0xOOsN1xsKrQSF/1dfDqVGTkLK6PdMnmCnyvpWXe96KAm4BLGaq61ts7 Bm36+HOPw3oQN7RIb6SscdgupyO4HDFqn97C8PJXmC9YtMj+KkkgydPMa/xfG9X93L jqwNUOC+BBP4WsaD/MjjUEl63Y3FSHGy8giEi9vY= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B7B33858CDA for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 03:51:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7B7B33858CDA ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 7B7B33858CDA ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713844275; cv=none; b=MochSlrTOoBSOSWPZr+i6xCnCIu7BeSOf+5qoT2WRDvxuIR+IkIMOo9PrC4V4uaVauZln8TOF7JCZIJRh1S2yDuj9f7nTMPelm/KL0Wxne2xkEwbJKDFd1i5vd1VXM7OzFZquK4usfvrpZ6PO30FAxpUYcFvPEuj0UuegCdImdQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713844275; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4j+V8d+adK8v5r+QOM/QNnO2Re/Gqp3V2Gx64iAp5fA=; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=WluJSU8ipekRw3XnDPOJXstTJr+VfsgIUY2VOFUyGP9XPezfpQ0upIU1X5rHjZv+AxPC20RB87b24bdfgYkJkbkCuGE3ZvPKltq8NHdx2zbkDJw3xcqsUQ5VPiPmqlx+BHplq04vSxLP8NlfpnwmfqunESM5BasyhXbBTfilucU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from mail-io1-f69.google.com (mail-io1-f69.google.com [209.85.166.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-630-rwMJOSg1PEeECv-HkFYZcA-1; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:51:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: rwMJOSg1PEeECv-HkFYZcA-1 Received: by mail-io1-f69.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-7ddf0219685so44572639f.3 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 20:51:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713844271; x=1714449071; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=mWI5cbdqfeXM9SurZgJduTnpS8hbpVyXfnN2TkdwTac=; b=W1KynudXvkEpUBvjtxe7Oo8ML/MFr9wcCdHqEdgooRaxLh5wh5Pt7Z3AhDqe25xuvY MNRCWiQiGpj+17b3xVR/2IVTJ1+UIWjMwL3NKUm28CyjT9S7ivtBWA95DfTbOBNtcAln F+0K04QBoamb6sTCOl/I3rxEl5O4PM37Sh44RqdRpF7bMdwsrg2iz3a3vcsRm4mSu5ni F3qZfdkBk21uwMqe8/Hio6p447d1OIhy36dQlKt+l5f6c9ukrdDUzs/VrFp1hlZ1oBkz /qRD5GT/wij6n3QCkTlQumC0PlbdJ8dOKOFGAKg28c1wPPnx6pgDVyRecOWssPJVpGUg 8Ytg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX6bhWj4M6cNjAlmrfXltNyYIjK2nnbF53rBLoTRnUpWnOCjoG1Sp26f3HYbm7aR32GlaJlShZJBQ0GA7c/sMBpvME= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyAsV7BDhg4dd9GH91G50uJ0cNWrf47cRIKruIpH2XmWvXDAffV ZEPLrzP5YGRlpC/we/Lt8LrQmFa8/OhbIkJ+OW9RHpme1iKFnxdROnX4fN+EECBoDPdCBKJBfB7 tfGqJKUhLw+S3zVXNUU5NznsKp2GQptXn8bknYBC61B8YtvRFp4xlSSQcvPnOV/pNWil/XqaZaI jJnN6/khNEwEHN9LsR+BDWLdE= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:d904:0:b0:7d9:6351:4ef3 with SMTP id r4-20020a6bd904000000b007d963514ef3mr15095602ioc.5.1713844271432; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 20:51:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHV4wEOLqRyF1fxbIRQs5jJIhCgcICYp9busYvjVqqrF4pgVNU/zXP0n0gVmnVHX8EuZ3DXqgKkoo2nrwEOjZo= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:d904:0:b0:7d9:6351:4ef3 with SMTP id r4-20020a6bd904000000b007d963514ef3mr15095587ioc.5.1713844271173; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 20:51:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240417232725.GC25080@gnu.wildebeest.org> <20240418173726.GD9069@redhat.com> <87v849qudy.fsf@tromey.com> <87wmooep76.fsf@tromey.com> In-Reply-To: <87wmooep76.fsf@tromey.com> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:51:00 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans To: Tom Tromey Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Overseers mailing list , Mark Wielaard , Joseph Myers , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.30 X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Jason Merrill via Gdb Reply-To: Jason Merrill Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:24=E2=80=AFPM Tom Tromey wrote: > Jason> Someone mentioned earlier that gerrit was previously tried > Jason> unsuccessfully. > > We tried it and gdb and then abandoned it. We tried to integrate it > into the traditional gdb development style, having it send email to > gdb-patches. I found these somewhat hard to read and in the end we > agreed not to use it. > > I've come around again to thinking we should probably abandon email > instead. For me the main benefit is that gerrit has patch tracking, > unlike our current system, where losing patches is fairly routine. > Indeed. Though Patchwork is another option for patch tracking, that glibc seem to be having success with. Jason> I think this is a common pattern in GCC at least: someone has an > Jason> idea for a workflow improvement, and gets it working, but it > Jason> isn't widely adopted. > > It essentially has to be mandated, IMO. > > For GCC this seems somewhat harder since the community is larger, so > there's more people to convince. > Absolutely, but now with the office hours it seems more feasible to build momentum (or see that there isn't enough support) without having to wait until Cauldron. Jason