From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43316 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2015 16:33:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 43300 invoked by uid 89); 24 Feb 2015 16:33:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ig0-f180.google.com Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-ig0-f180.google.com) (209.85.213.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:33:24 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b16so28168888igk.1 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:33:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.61.238 with SMTP id t14mr21286599igr.34.1424795602391; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:33:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.107.5.21 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:33:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: many unused function warnings in gdb 7.9 on darwin From: Jack Howarth To: gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 Building the gdb 7.9 release on x86_64-apple-darwin14 produces many warnings of the form... remote.c:2567:1: warning: unused function 'VEC_thread_item_t_embedded_size' [-Wunused-function] DEF_VEC_O(thread_item_t); ^ ./common/vec.h:435:20: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_VEC_O' VEC_T(T); \ ^ ./common/vec.h:863:22: note: expanded from macro '\ DEF_VEC_FUNC_O' static inline size_t VEC_OP (T,embedded_size) \ ^ ./common/vec.h:399:22: note: expanded from macro 'VEC_OP' #define VEC_OP(T,OP) VEC_##T##_##OP ^ :55:1: note: expanded from here VEC_thread_item_t_embedded_size ^ Shouldn't those VEC declarations use a wrapper to avoid them on targets not supporting that code? Jack