From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16635 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2014 17:42:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16623 invoked by uid 89); 31 Mar 2014 17:42:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ve0-f181.google.com Received: from mail-ve0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-ve0-f181.google.com) (209.85.128.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:42:41 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f181.google.com with SMTP id oy12so8286403veb.40 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:42:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=D5MXaLxPt550S8o+Rg3Fk6dmq3wHQoUp6WDsKW1gvV0=; b=IYEE+kpBIlQ/Wb5dLNw6s94mvyH1VdNxqHVU3RGqLoMBqVo+Cr9jPcuNBPdtE3gLWd mEDYV+OSRCbR0b2T4xr2mr4a45TL/MnvK0OBOPFiTQ1Aec2iw6QJWMv7o5fqskDj3JQ4 OCcPMcETzqn/DjEKR27fVbpzSBNwy7lbF3FlhBbKkSvyt8/vntwR5MlEPTI/NG3LLrjM 1nm4WJd07GRIiPQHbK0mRneHfOshWzUC0k+w5k9CwJ92PRs5smH4o3HeEyPiwGPqNSSy bA/gw1bN8zy9B8S/OSXq94qcj02hcJ6ZaXcgZNQEZMssDDgC+21oDGFEm17ZMMWg4Fss 1oIA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmBqfaVowu3kGYkONHSVQNnaIHId3sBCIc4XpPMWz0djieIGDT9u5orzGMfATJICYYSYwOKhSWUh6tC9ubM3/JL5caNj03AAtajC2PBcMQzdXzRP8bIONB50fYDv+Wajllf0Gf6WON187Wv7JkFCcXbXZzsY7NqFWIW2nO0e5Vmou7BVLExkmZ/A+EYmgxe4qrwxCDw MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.20.199 with SMTP id qp7mr1833671vcb.24.1396287758519; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:42:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.13.101 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:42:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5320982C.2060308@redhat.com> References: <53209273.9090407@redhat.com> <5320982C.2060308@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cleaning out obsolete bugs in bugzilla From: Doug Evans To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 03/12/2014 05:10 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > >> "WONTFIX" could come across with an unintended connotation alright, >> but I have no current data to assign a probability to it happening. >> At the moment it's just gut feeling, which is why I think there's >> benefit to something else that doesn't require much, if any, >> discussion, like OBSOLETE. > > I think OBSOLETE is a good idea. > >> But I don't have a strong opinion on the >> ultimate choice. If people have a strong opinion on not inventing >> anything new, fine by me, let's go with WONTFIX until we have real >> data that it can be a problem. Cool, thanks. OBSOLETE has been added (by overseers) and I've updated the wiki. https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/DeveloperTips#Closing_obsolete_bugs