From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 0AWlKrWLNWS/0ygAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:32:53 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id AC1171E221; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:32:53 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=GDd84mlt; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CF831E0D3 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:32:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC64385773A for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:32:49 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DCC64385773A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1681230769; bh=+Lqy7B3Wj0RNqKfXf8mDTC9XJWiF94CKvsQ4azlrb2U=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=GDd84mltD7o8WrNhXiWmmnjqTlWprC4jccRqfV0KIv4p4eLS3m+b5eiEwuI9E/x5u LkGTOThzTpPDz/DTvjPu/Gu0ut4r//QJ9kDagEtvz+rmqVjTybU1I/48vbJBxOrYU7 3XwdSzalN25pYt9j2hX7n/AfXWpETYmr5b9Bm8Ik= Received: from mail-pj1-x102b.google.com (mail-pj1-x102b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB8DF3858D28; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:32:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org EB8DF3858D28 Received: by mail-pj1-x102b.google.com with SMTP id w11so9051046pjh.5; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:32:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681230740; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+Lqy7B3Wj0RNqKfXf8mDTC9XJWiF94CKvsQ4azlrb2U=; b=L48J3wLmbWQzZXe/pbHOVpT7swnq4b/OxR9uCK2E5kk4HkieiqqjkRgwRSgkMYn2Lk Gjn+E6zDHUPxswZvv2mIf4TLG9dFEsCjsDjP2L1qgaFtKAKhQ23KeN2VwPGGcbaLkoyy WTD1MffhCHdSDej+j8nxzWsOgDjM+8AE+iE26KaQJ7Zmo/FGCxgeCX0EjrT+UyxT/Ltl QEyB1nZYGXsGV5NHwpDjTLC//3b+CEiyXQLlYQDsDLMfH5R47DmOPGsYHcPtHXXLqx7y k6dpbY/5wWjTI0r6NoNkwtp0Z0ibQAf5QMtmDu00uanBecn3a3Ivuvk47GCetInCq5Wj 3NQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fkes90oxh116wZ9ZmMyHOQpGpqt0awuENT9T5EDGcU1QChIYQC HujzfDNoZ2aTblunrOVnL0rerul+ACzFy8H3SLl9peJh3Zs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YWBbh2r2ZscObPnfiRUWRRgKZYSmF/rgfxJiCuf7cz1nLimMqLM2vnDyv81mzdl505+e0jhOfgxzCuipituxc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a511:b0:19f:3cc1:e3cc with SMTP id s17-20020a170902a51100b0019f3cc1e3ccmr1220495plq.3.1681230739777; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:32:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1c38b926-e003-0e21-e7f1-3d5dbec2aabf@redhat.com> <838rf4ou73.fsf@gnu.org> <03bbbbff-5bcc-3fa8-a5e9-9b9cbd541f06@simark.ca> <83cz4aa2h7.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:32:08 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: Adding a SECURITY.md document to the Binutils To: Nick Clifton Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Simon Marchi , binutils@sourceware.org, siddhesh@gotplt.org, gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Matt Rice via Gdb Reply-To: Matt Rice Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 4:23=E2=80=AFPM Nick Clifton via Binutils wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > But I thought Nick said he didn't intend to use any markup? > > That was certainly my intent. Is there anything that we can gain from > using markup for this document ? I think the main reason to avoid renaming it is certain processes expect th= e file to be named Security.md. E.g. when filing a bug report on github repositories will link to it as an alternative channel for opening security issues. given that binutils doesn't use github for bug reports this might be somewhat less persuasive. I'm not sure if forks may use github issue tracker, there are a few other things which look for the file, such as a thing which scores the processes set up for a given repo, and a more visible tab. I tend to think that .md markup is lightweight enough that it is readable without rendering, and don't see much benefit from diverging from this process... > > > if so, we > > are talking plain text anyway, and a .md file name will just mislead. > > Agreed. > > Cheers > Nick >