From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14028 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2013 16:47:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13999 invoked by uid 89); 23 Aug 2013 16:47:40 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f182.google.com) (209.85.217.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:47:39 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id v20so676557lbc.27 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:47:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.9.37 with SMTP id w5mr387276laa.23.1377276456517; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:47:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.3.76 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:47:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8738q4gj7a.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <201308222010.r7MKAljG013904@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <87wqnda0tm.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A Proposal to Move to Git From: Matt Rice To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Tom Tromey , Mark Kettenis , GDB , Binutils Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2 On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:37 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Matt Rice wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:40 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> I assume git repo has both binutils and gdb. Is that possible to >>> only checkout binutils portion? >>> >> >> you can do this with sparse checkouts, but note that it is something >> you will have to do on the client side, as far as I know there is no >> way to configure this from the server side/on cloning, and your .git >> dir will contain history for both.. >> > > Does sparse checkout work for binuitls/gdb git repo? > Has anyone tried? It did the last time that I tried, and was even useful for doing an uberbaum tree using the gcc git mirror, this may make maintaining the files existing in both repositories easier, but since it required a different conversion of the repositories than the current mirrors, I haven't done so recently.