From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-47173-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 94363 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2019 16:50:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 94355 invoked by uid 89); 26 Aug 2019 16:50:46 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:528, H*f:CAPTJ0XH, H*f:sk:ULSbw@m, H*f:sk:r2socS0
X-HELO: mail-io1-f54.google.com
Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com (HELO mail-io1-f54.google.com) (209.85.166.54) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:50:45 +0000
Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id p12so38972793iog.5        for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 09:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to         :cc;        bh=vugJ4V0iWogmI5HaEEEePgT3oKOuc8EomlcdN05WxRQ=;        b=GuLnIpf8u10g4O1ucHXtNEHSpkUyJUV8StXhseC7D7POfEj7YY8pOK7EsCB2Ip3mCy         eHakk8C0ZmFzkWRsBQRENj3QUOjKmTi8WUBt79GQaRb/zptqKmyQp+JIBNTs3ezAwF0A         kB5PDuI15nePuLmIUHijH8VrfAesHkEODe7E92pgh/uCa9S4CrkXj6dNXELgtwnmklM0         eyvogd9F1NErOJDZ9dCGgxNJ1dYXGizl+QcMa9QeTr5tt0LFjmQUmxrtRqb3dTHwyFgi         sH2mBRrPShsk9ascFInPB5OPi8STs9ARuF6F55aviqqDR+YziPv/eCZeAxKwMflF5u2U         FeHQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACMsj9PVtSb_+1gYAUaQPafUd0A-PDuQT5UpvVUWmOHExzxb=w@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTJ0XH=GzX4+xR_OiVcc=+r2socS0uJuF6zoNcR6=Ux+ULSbw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPTJ0XH=GzX4+xR_OiVcc=+r2socS0uJuF6zoNcR6=Ux+ULSbw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrea Cardaci <cyrus.and@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:50:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CACMsj9Nb5LsRdAXhfOH=rZNCboORhwqChCRu730-SA4MEjtr-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Function address incoherence
To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2

On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 18:34, Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> wrote:

> Why don't you use frame.function() and get the address from there?

This actually seems a good idea and I can't remember why I didn't end
up using that, let me try...

> (and why parse_and_eval instead of lookup_symbol?)

Because:

    >>> gdb.lookup_symbol('_start')
    (None, False)
    >>> gdb.parse_and_eval('_start')
    <gdb.Value object at 0x7f340fe3dcb0>

Maybe I need to specify a block different than the current.